Journal of Service Science
 Fall 2011 Volume 4, Number 2 © 2011 The Clute Institute
Essentials Of Service Design
Harry Katzan, Jr., Webster University, USA
This paper is a conspectus of service design for service scientists. Historically, science has been concerned with the discovery and study of natural and socially developed phenomena, and the role of design has been to create new artifacts and processes and to improve existing ones. Service has been an important part of the fabric of societal culture from ancient times, so the notion of service as the co-creation of value by provider and client is well established. It necessarily follows that the objective of service design is to add value by enhancing the efficiency, effectiveness, and efficacy of older service systems and to create newer ones with requisite attributes. This is a topic that has not been covered in traditional service science research. Thus, service design, as a discipline, seeks to facilitate the operation of the modern global economy that is now based on service. The necessary elements of service design are introduced and important concepts are identified.
Service; Service Systems; Service Science; Service Design
service is an interaction between entities that co-creates value, where the entities involved may be persons or nonpersons, such as government offices, educational institutions, and possibly some form of automation. (Katzan [9]) A service interaction is ordinarily construed to be a process consisting of several steps organized to achieve an identifiable purpose. In the recent view of things, all products are essentially services, so that service and service design assume expanded roles in the development of cultural artifacts. (Vargo [23]) Service design, on the other hand, is a process that specifically takes an abstract idea and turns it into a pragmatic reality. The entities participating in a service have differing roles -- often referred to as the provider and the client. Ordinarily, the client experiences a need that the provider resolves, changing the end state of both participants. For example, a patient with a medical situation interacts with a physician for appropriate attention and, in a nominal instance, a differing but tangible value is created for both parties in the service. In a similar, but slightly different instance, a property owner contracts with a landscaping service for a maintenance operation. In this case, the physical service object is the responsibility of the client, but the salient details are the same. There is, of course, more to service than a simple service operation. The service itself may consist of several steps and require auxiliary service. On the part of the client, the process may consist of the awareness of a need for attention, scheduling of the service event, and other logistical steps. On the part of the provider, the service, per se, may require supplementary support service, prior to and during the service interaction. In the naive view of service, as just mentioned, the number of participants is relatively few, and the time span is relatively short, so that the total experience can be conceptualized as a single service event. In major service projects, such as a major and complicated medical procedure, the construction of a large building, or a military operation, where the number of interactions is high and the time span is longer, an organizing framework, called
, is required. (Saco [18]) The essentials of service design is the subject of this paper. They are based on the tacit knowledge that when we design a service or a product, we, implicitly or explicitly, adhere to a well-defined set of steps or techniques for scoping the problem, analyzing the design parameters, generation of feasible solutions, and implementation of the selected option.
 Journal of Service Science
 Fall 2011 Volume 4, Number 2
© 2011 The Clute Institute
It is important to recognize that there is a reasonable limit to what can be achieved through service design. How an architect arrives at the characteristics of a structure or a physician deals with patients is in some respect a matter of personality and style as manifested in the cultural environment. In fact,
 and holistic studies are often regarded as important components of service design. To apply design principles to a situation, it would seem that several elements should be present. First, a designed service should have a stated purpose that can be given to identification. A behavior pattern is not a service, even though many social phenomena consist of elements that may be repeatable and regarded as service. Here is an example.
 In a hypothetical activity, such as going to business on a regular basis, a person would ordinarily engage in several optional activities nominally regarded as service. For example, a person might walk to the bus stop, take a bus to the train station, take the train to the location of business, and walk to the office. In the process, that person might purchase a newspaper and subsequently buy a cup of special coffee to drink in the workplace. Under another
circumstance, that same person might take a taxi to the office. Thus, the ordinary process of “going to work” is not
a service, even though it involves multiple service components.
The various constituent services exist as discrete areas of functionality connected by independent access points.
Even though they support the contention that “services are everywhere,” the various facilities are not necessarily
connected in any requisite manner. Second, the service components in any endeavor should possess a necessary and sufficient relationship and not exist as a disparate collection of services. It follows that a collection of service components intended to achieve a predetermined function, when executed, is regarded as a service system, analogous to a missile system or an educational system. Service design is primarily concerned with service systems. Formally, a service system is a collection of resources, economic entities, and services processes capable of engaging in and supporting one or more service events. Service processes may interact or be linked in a service value chain. This subject is covered in subsequent sections.
The Evolution of Service Design
Historically, the role of science has been to investigate natural and societal-developed phenomena, and the role of design (and engineering) has been to build artificial things. (Simon[20]) However, there is more to the art and science of service than the recognition that 80% of the gross domestic product of most developed countries is derived from service and that more than 90% of persons are engaged in service work, so that service science, service design, and service innovation are important subjects. Some of the most obvious examples of the proliferation of
service are “service to the community” and “community service to the individual and family,” often evidenced by
government programs at various levels. This is the basis of service as we know it today. Consider, for example, the interdependency of residents and families in agricultural, mining, and textile communities. An instance of the collectivism of service would be in the case of an unfortunate burning of a family barn in an agricultural community in an earlier generation. The members of the group would get together and rebuild the barn, frequently as a single event in a single day. The men would build the barn through cooperative activity; the women would cook and talk; and the kids would play and get in the way. The value of the collective service to the affected family is obvious, but the value to the community, as a whole, is the tacit knowledge that it could happen to anyone. Natural disasters would necessarily be placed in this category. As the fabric of communities evolved into towns and then cities, states, nations, and regions, a social structure evolved and the need for leadership emerged. Leaders, such as the mayor of a town, would commit to services, such as fire and police service, and the birth of service design essentially began to take place.
The Environment of Service Design
A service is a socially constructed temporal event that possesses a lifecycle comprised of design, development, analysis, and implementation, as with most technological innovations. A service universe is a collection of services under consideration at a given point in time by a person, group, organization, or even a society. A service universe is typically a set of services, organized in some fashion to achieve a discernible purpose.
 Journal of Service Science
 Fall 2011 Volume 4, Number 2 © 2011 The Clute Institute
Since service design is an eclectic endeavor, it would necessarily be expected to reflect differing points of view. There are two fundamentally different points of view of service design: the global view and the local view. The global view refers to the notion of a system comprised of interacting and complementary services. One could consider the global view as an external service description, useful for determining how a collection of services functions in order to benefit various people, organizations, and business processes. The local view describes and delineates the steps in a distinct service process, emphasizing the service participants and the complementary roles they play in a service interaction. The provider role is regarded as a serving activity, and the client role is, likewise, regarded as a receiving activity. Moreover, the collaboration adapts to the win-win model of economic exchange, since value is co-created for both participants. The complementary form of activity is intended to distinguish it from a supplementary form in which participants operate as partners to perform a stated function. For example, a physician and a patient exhibit complementary roles in a service, whereas a scenario in which two masons work together to build a structure represents a supplementary form of behavior. As introduced above, service systems are social constructs that commonly encompass other services and are components of a larger reality. An organizational structure of this particular genre could be regarded from either of two points of view: as an economy or as an adaptive social structure. As an economy, it is a system of relationships that govern the availability of scarce resources and operate under conditions of efficiency and effectiveness. As an adaptive social structure, the efficacy of a service event depends upon the dynamic environment in which an organization operates. Accordingly, a service system is a cooperative dynamically changing formal system, with a porous boundary so that the environment in which it resides has a deterministic effect on its behavior. Development of a service design involves the mechanics of service systems and requires three things: an appropriate operational platform, a design theoretic formulation, and a collection of relevant tools and conventions that are introduced in subsequent sections.
Service Design and Operation Lifecycle
Service design is one of the few disciplines in which the basic principles and resultant theory apply to practically all service processes. In its most basic form, a service is a value producing interaction between a service provider and a service client, consisting of a process conceptualized as a layered set of activities. (Ferrario and Guardino [4], Katzan [10]) It is useful to conceptualize the layers according to the following global service system lifecycle:
Service commitment
Service production
Service availability
Service delivery
Service analysis
Service termination Initially, we are going to be looking at a global view of service design, where the lifecycle pertains to a set of generic services supplied by an economic entity, such as a governing body, a business, an institution, or an individual acting in an executive capacity. Essentially, the global service lifecycle provides the operational context for service design.
Service commitment 
 refers to the formal agreement to provide a class of services to a service audience by a principal or trustee with the proper administrative control over the service environment. The agreement to provide fire service by a municipality and the founding of a health clinic are common examples. Service commitment incorporates a process for identifying where, when, and how an organization can make service more valuable to their clients and to themselves. A service principle commits to content and not to process.
Service production
 pertains to service provisioning, infrastructure, availability, quality management, and back-office processing. The producer is the agent of the principal in a prototypical principal-agent scenario. The principal and agent may be the same economic entity or different economic entities depending upon the scope of the service domain. The manager of a chain of restaurants and the medical director of a clinic are examples. Service
 Journal of Service Science
 Fall 2011 Volume 4, Number 2
© 2011 The Clute Institute
production is prototypically concerned with client retention and acquisition. The principle element in service production is maintenance of the service infrastructure, consisting of physical facilities, operational procedures, satisfaction of legal requirements, competent provider provisioning, and dependable auxiliary service provisioning. The establishing hours-of-operation is a simple task of service production.
Service availability
 relates to the time during which a service is available. Commitment does not necessarily imply availability, because of a variety of spatiotemporal events that invariably occur when implementing a service. The service principal is concerned with scheduling, and other operational considerations.
Service delivery
 is the class of actions usually regarded as the service and is the layer where the service client comes into the picture. The doctor/patient relationship is a good elementary example of this layer, but service design usually is associated with more complex processes such as a medical provisioning that consists of several steps. The service provider, who could have a dual role as producer, is an agent of the producer as the primary source of service revenue and the primary provider of service.
Service analysis
 refers to measurement activities and the determination of value propositions needed to sustain service operations. To some extent, all services consist of the application of resources, and the success of those services is dependent upon how efficiently and effectively those resources are applied in a normative manner to a specific problem domain. (Spohrer [21]) The service analysis is normally associated with reducing costs and customer satisfaction; it is an ongoing activity in service delivery. Where implicit agreements exist, service analysis involves responsiveness, timeliness, and completeness.
Service termination
 reflects the inevitable consequence of a dynamic and evolving economic environment where a total service operation has been completed or has to be retired, because of insufficient activity or realigned opportunities. The global lifecycle represents a provisioning perspective of service systems. The basic tenet of service provisioning is the following. The client or customer starts out with expectations, and a service producer or provider should start out by assessing what those expectations are. However, not all service processes are successful. From a service analysis viewpoint, the success of a service event is dependent upon how accurately the service participants assess their roles. In order for a service system to be viable, it must exist and persist. To exist, that service must satisfy the economic goals of provider, client, producer, customer, and trustee, where the economic goals are known as the value proposition of the service. To persist, a service must be ongoing and not evolve into an unsuccessful state through one of the following situations:
The participants’ value proposition changes.
The customer decides to engage in “self service.”
The customer decides to change service providers.
The customer decides to forgo service. Thus, cumulative service decisions from within the customer domain essentially determine the persistence of a service commitment. The service design lifecycle supplies the context for a complex service process.
Service Terminology
Several items of terminology are needed to completely describe the service environment.
Tangible service
 is a provider/client event that results in demonstrable values to the service participants
. In retailing, it is the acquisition of a product including attendant activities that change the ownership attribute of the associated product. However, the value proposition for a product may be determined from the service it provides, rather than from the
 In the domain of service, the use of the adjective tangible is unfortunate. Some authors use the term tangible to denote a product and intangible to refer to a service. In this paper, tangible denotes demonstrable value and intangible denotes an affective state of personal awareness. In many cases, a fancy car in the driveway or a slick suit of clothes engenders intangible value. If a person goes to a medical practitioner and he or she gives immediate relief, most people would agree that the result of that pure service is tangible. In addition to satisfactory results (tangible value), for example, many persons additionally receive intangible value from the fact that their physician was trained at a particular clinic.
 Journal of Service Science
 Fall 2011 Volume 4, Number 2 © 2011 The Clute Institute
intrinsic value of its specific components. In pure service, such as a people and possession processing service, value is created through the work performed on behalf of the client by the provider and that service does not involve a
 product. With information service, the service’s value is derived from the transfer of information from ser 
vice provider to the client.
intangible service
 provides value for a service participant through its affective component. Certain products, such as premium automobiles, special jewelry, and elegant real estate, for example, are typically associated with a high-level of intangible service. The intangible value of a product may exceed its tangible value. A
 primary service
 is the core service for which the provider and the client interact to produce demonstrable value. It may be a simple service event or a complex process. Examples are a dental appointment or a lawn care service.
A secondary service is a service that does not exist separately as a primary service and plays a supportive role to a primary service. Common examples are the weigh in and
 blood pressure checks associated with a doctor’s
visit and the acceptance and delivery of garments at a dry cleaning establishment. Secondary service is sometimes called supplementary or referral service. A
 facilitating service
 is disjoint from a primary or secondary service and enables a client to obtain utility from a tangible service. Usability service, commonly associated with automobiles and computers, is a common example of a facilitating service. Another common example of a facilitating service is the purchase of an event ticket. In this instance, the event
 be it a visit to the theatre, sporting match, or an amusement park
 is the tangible service and the ticket is the intangible service. An
auxiliary service
 is independent from a core service and may be experienced before or after the primary
service. A blood test taken prior to a doctor’s appointment and a medical referral are examples of auxiliary services.
Service Execution
In order for a service provider and a client to co-create a service event, there must be some degree of locality to the situation, in the sense that the client travels to the provider, the provider travels to the client, the client and provider execute the service event in a third-party location, or they communicate via some form of interactive device and its corresponding media. Location is basic to service provisioning. When the client travels to the provider site, the location is termed a
service factory
 and the client or the service object remain in the service factory for the duration of the service transaction. A service factory can be organized as a job shop or an assembly line, topics that are covered later. When the service object is left in th
e provider’s facilities, the location is known as a
service shop
. The provider may travel to client facilities, as in the cases of consulting or nursing home care. With information service, the provider may reside in a remote facility and provide access through a
service porta
l. A related consideration is the distinction between discrete service and continuous service. There are many edge cases. Insurance is commonly regarded as a continuous service, as is banking
 except in the cases where the customer visits a bank branch. A hotel stay is a discrete service, as is a train ride or a medical procedure in a hospital. Automobile maintenance and household service are also usually regarded as discrete services. In the latter cases, when a service eve
nt is over, it’s over. A follow
-on service is regarded as another service event. The primary objective of a service event is referred to as the core service that has tangible value to the service participants. The core service is conventionally comprised of primary, secondary, and auxiliary services, as described earlier. We are going to establish five categories with which the execution of a service event, per se, can be categorized:
 Modality discrete, continuous Diversity heterogeneous, homogeneous Temporality active, passive Complexity low complexity, high complexity
of 18