Documents

Applicant 2009 - d m harish memorial moot competition

Description
it is the best memorial on part of the applicant in d m harish memorial moot competition.
Categories
Published
of 40
849
Categories
Published
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Similar Documents
Share
Transcript
  TEAM   CODE:   “O” I N T HE I NTERNATIONAL C OURT O F J USTICE A T T HE P EACE P ALACE ,   T HE H AGUE ,   T HE N ETHERLANDS   Y EAR 2009 T HE C ASE C ONCERNING T HE C ONSEQUENCES O F T HE D ISASTER A T M ONRON F ACTORY A ND O THER R ELATED M ATTERS   T HE R EPUBLIC O F A NGHORE (A PPLICANT ) V. T HE R EPUBLICS O F R ATANKA A ND C ARISTHAN (R ESPONDENTS ) O N S UBMISSION T O T HE I NTERNATIONAL C OURT O F J USTICE   W RITTEN S UBMISSION F OR T HE A PPLICANT   T HE 2009   D.   M.   H ARISH M EMORIAL G OVERNMENT L AW C OLLEGE I  NTERNATIONAL M OOT C OURT C OMPETITION    T   HE 2009    D.    M.    H   ARISH  M   EMORIAL G OVERNMENT  L  AW C  OLLEGE  I   NTERNATIONAL  M  OOT C  OURT C  OMPETITION    INDEX INDEX   OF   AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... I   STATEMENT   OF   JURISDICTION ........................................................................................... X   SYNOPSIS   OF   FACTS ................................................................................................................ XI   SUMMARY   OF   ARGUMENTS ............................................................................................... XIV   BODY   OF   ARGUMENTS ............................................................................................................ 1   I.]   T HAT R ATANKA AND C ARISTHAN ARE JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CAUSING TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE ,  AND ARE LIABLE TO PAY COMPENSATION FOR THE SAME . ....................................................................................................................................... 1   A.]  That Ratanka has violated the principles of International law by causing transboundary environmental harm.................................................................................................................. 1 B.]  That No direct link can be established between Anghore’s previous industrial activities and the current environmental disaster. ............................................................................................. 7 C.]  That Caristhan too owes responsibility for the damage and is liable to pay compensation to Anghore........................................................................................................................................ 7 II.   T HAT THE R EPUBLIC OF C ARISTHAN AND R ATANAKA ARE JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR VIOLATION OF A NGHORE ’ S TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTEGRITY  .................................. 9   A.]  That the conduct of Caristhan constitutes as an act of aggression......................................... 9  T   HE 2009    D.    M.    H   ARISH  M   EMORIAL G OVERNMENT  L  AW C  OLLEGE  I   NTERNATIONAL  M  OOT C  OURT C  OMPETITION    B.]  That the use of military base in Ratanka by Caristhan casts responsibility on Ratanka...... 11 III.   T HAT A NSEIANS ARE R ATANKIANS WHO ARE NOT ENTITLED TO R EFUGEE STATUS AND HENCE CAN BE REPATRIATED BACK TO R ATANKA  ...................................................................... 12   A.]  That Anseians are Ratankians........ ..................................................................................... 12 B.]  That the Anseians are not “Refugees” and hence can be repatriated back........................... 15 C.]  That Ratanka and Caristhan are obligated to pay due compensation to Anghore for the cost incurred by it on the welfare of Anseians. ................................................................................. 18 IV.   T HAT C ARISTHAN HAS VIOLATED ITS COMITY OBLIGATIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW ....................................................................................................................................................... 19   CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ XVII    T   HE 2009    D.    M.    H   ARISH  M   EMORIAL G OVERNMENT  L  AW C  OLLEGE  I   NTERNATIONAL  M  OOT C  OURT C  OMPETITION    ----------------------------------Memorial for the Applicant---------------------------------------- i INDEX OF AUTHORITIES I.   U N   D OCUMENTS   A ND   R ESOLUTIONS   Charter of the United Nations, 15 U.N.C.I.O.335 ........................................................................ 10 Commentaries to the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, in Report of the International Law Commission, Fifty-Third Session, U.N. GAOR, 56th Sess., Supp. No. 10, at 81, U.N. Doc. A/56/10 (2001) .............................................................. 10 Declaration on the Human Rights of Individuals who are not Nationals of the Country in which they live, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1985, U.N.G.A.   R  ES . 40/114 ................... 17 Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, in Report of the International Law Commission, Fifty-Third Session, U.N. GAOR, 56th Sess., Supp. No. 10, U.N. Doc. A/56/10 (2001) ................................................................................................... 10, 18 G.A. Res. 1803, U.N. G.A.O.R, 17th Sess. (1962); G.A. Res. 2849; U.N. G.A.O.R. 26th Sess. (1979); ......................................................................................................................................... 5 G.A. Res. 2849 (XXVI) U.N. Doc. A/RES/2849 (Dec. 20, 1971) ................................................. 1 G.A. Res. 2995 (XXVII) U.N. Doc. A/2995 (Dec. 15, 1972) ........................................................ 1 G.A. Res. 34/186, U.N. Doc. A/RES/34/186 (Dec. 18, 1979) ........................................................ 1 G.A. Res. 56/82, U.N. Doc. A/RES/56/82 (Dec. 12, 2001)............................................................ 1 Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers, 1966 Report of the Fifty-Second Conference-Helsinki 477, 484 (1967) ............................................................................ 2
Search
Tags
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x