A viral infection of the hand commonly seen after the feast of sacrifice: human orf (orf of the hand)

A viral infection of the hand commonly seen after the feast of sacrifice: human orf (orf of the hand)
of 5
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  A viral infection of the hand commonly seen after the feast of sacrifice: human orf (orf of the hand) M. UZEL 1 *, S. SASMAZ 2 , S. BAKARIS 3 , E. CETINUS 1 , E. BILGIC 1 ,A. KARAOGUZ 1 , A. OZKUL 4 AND  O. ARICAN 2 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical Faculty of University of Kahramanmaras Sutcuimam,Kahramanmaras, Turkey 2 Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty of University of Kahramanmaras Sutcuimam, Kahramanmaras,Turkey 3 Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of University of Kahramanmaras Sutcuimam, Kahramanmaras,Turkey 4 Department of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey ( Accepted 15 December 2004 ) SUMMARY Orf of the hand is an uncommon zoonotic infection caused by a dermotropic DNA virus thatbelongs to the  Parapoxvirus  genus of the family Poxviridae. It is transmitted to humans throughcontact with infected sheep and goats and is reported as an occupational disease. We report ninecases of human orf seen in the hands of individuals, who were not occupationally exposed, afterthe feast of sacrifice in Turkey. Three cases were teachers and six out of the nine were housewives.We observed musculoskeletal complications and misdiagnoses. It is important to consider humanorf in the differential diagnosis of hand lesions to prevent overtreatment and complications. INTRODUCTION Orf (also known as sore mouth disease, scabby mouthdisease, infectious pustular dermatitis, contagiousectyma and ovine pustular dermatitis) is a commondisease in sheep and goats. It is caused by a dermo-tropic DNA virus that belongs to the  Parapoxvirus genus of the family Poxviridae [1–3]. It is a benigndisease in humans which is occasionally reported inthe literature. It has been reported in professionalworkers such as shepherds, sheepshearers and individ-uals bottle-feeding motherless lambs, butchers, abat-toir workers and veterinary surgeons [2]. The handsare the most common site of orf, with other sites suchas the face only occasionally being involved [4].Orf is rare among viral infections of the hand [5].The characteristic localized lesion is similar to a skintumour and resolves spontaneously [2].We reported nine orf lesions seen on the hands of non-professional individuals after the feast of sacrificein Turkey. Their clinical features at differentstages, complications and socio-cultural features wereinvestigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine cases of orf which were diagnosed in the daysfollowing the feasts of sacrifice in 2003 and 2004 arereported in our study. The cases were seen by derma-tologists and orthopaedic surgeons on the day of referral. Diagnosis was made by history, appearanceand location of the lesion and clinical course.Fluid and scrapings were taken for bacterial staining * Author for correspondence: Dr M. Uzel, KSU Tip FakultesiOrtopedi ve Travmatoloji AD, 46050, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.(Email: or Epidemiol. Infect.  (2005),  133 , 653–657.  f 2005 Cambridge University Pressdoi:10.1017/S0950268805003778 Printed in the United Kingdom  techniques and bacterial culture in six cases. Biopsywas performed in five cases for further investigation:histopathological study and cultural isolationattempts, and electron microscopic examinationswere performed in these cases.The existence of any history of contact with sheepor goats, duration of the prodromal period, time fromappearance of the lesion to referral, the existence of any intervention to the lesion, profession, age andsex were recorded. The location of the lesions, thepatient’s dominant extremity, duration of recovery,complications and clinical symptoms were investi-gated. RESULTS All the cases were from the city centre (332100 in-habitants) of Kahramanmaras in the Mediterraneanregion of Turkey. They became contaminatedthrough direct contact with infected goats or sheepduring two feasts of sacrifice. All the sacrifices werenot subject to veterinary control. The animals wereslaughtered or prepared for consumption by the cases.There were six females and three males [mean age 45.2years (range 33–58 years)]. Three cases were teachersand six out of nine were housewives. The mean incu-bation period was 11.7 days (range 5–19 days). Theresolution of the lesions occurred within 37 days(range 20–70 days) on average (see Table).Orf was seen in the left hand in eight cases and theright hand in one. The extremities involved were thenon-dominant side in eight out of nine cases. Allthe lesions were located on the dorsum of the fingers.The index finger in three cases, the fifth finger in threecases, and one each for the thumb, third finger andfourth finger. Lesions progressed with distinct clinicalTable.  General evaluation of orf cases Patientno. SexAge(years) JobLocation inhand*,SurfaceIncubation(day)First referral dayafter lesion,First referral doctorinterventionRecoverytime(day) Complication1 M 52 Teacher L 2 5 5 33 StiffnessVolar anddorsalDermatologist Swan-neckdeformityGiant orf — Paresthesia2 M 43 Teacher L 4 5 10 24 — Dorsal PractitionerIncision3 F 51 Housewife L 5 7 30 70 — Dorsal Orthopaedic surgeonGiant orf — 4 F 46 Housewife R 3 19 14 31 — Dorsal PractitionerExcision5 F 58 Housewife L 5 18 23 55 — Dorsal Orthopaedic surgeon — 6 F 34 Housewife L 1 15 9 30 — Dorsal PractitionerAnthrax treatment7 M 41 Teacher L 2 14 16 30 — Dorsal Dermatologist — 8 F 49 Housewife L 5 15 9 20 — Dorsal Dermatologist — 9 F 33 Housewife L 2 7 11 40 — Dorsal Dermatologist — * L, left; R, right; number, finger order (example: L 2 = second finger of the left hand). 654 M. Uzel and others  evolution and resolved with no residual scarring inapproximately 6 weeks. This clinical course alsoverified the diagnosis of orf.Cases had little pain and no fever. History of axillary or elbow lymphadenopathy and malaise werepresent in two cases.Three cases received overtreatment from generalpractitioners. One received treatment for a diagnosisof anthrax. The lesion of another case was incised bya scalpel for drainage (Figs 1 and 2) while the lesion ina third case was excised totally. In two cases giantorf developed (Figs 3 and 4). The appearance andrapid progression of the lesion caused psychologicalstress and made the patients fearful of havingcancer. Psychological support was needed in thosecases.Complete blood counts were normal in all cases.The results of bacterial culture and staining werenegative. In five cases, histopathological confirmationwasmade.Therewasvacuolizationofcellsintheupperthird of the epidermis in some of the cases, while inother cases the epidermis showed acanthosis withfinger-like downward projections and the dermis con-tained dilated capillaries and mononuclear infiltrate(Fig. 5). Culture inoculations and electron micro-scopic examinations revealed no virus growth or viralparticles in the preparations monitored, respectively.In all cases, wound care with conservative measureswas applied. The symptomatic management consistedof adequate analgesia; wound care with povidone-iodine and keeping the lesion dry. There was no needfor antibiotics. All but one case resulted in healing Fig. 1.  Case 2. The appearance on referral day. Solitarylesion on nail fold at day 11 of infection and incision of the lesion are seen (acute stage). Fig. 2.  Case 2. Illustration of the lesion at day 19 of infection(regenerative stage). Fig. 3.  Case 3. The appearance on referral day. The solitarylesion on the dorsal surface of the finger was seen at day 30of infection (the end of the target stage). Fig. 4.  Case 3. The appearance of the lesion at day 41 of infection (acute stage). Human orf infection of the hand 655  without any complications. Stiffness in the finger joints, swan-neck deformity and paresthesia devel-oped in one case with giant orf. DISCUSSION The first definition of orf disease and a published casereport was by Newson & Cross in 1934 [6, 7]. Sincethat time, two large-scale studies have addressed thisdisease. A Norwegian study in 1975 reported on 119patients seen over an 18-year period. The authorsnoted that both human and animal infectionsoccurred more frequently in certain geographic areas.Diagnosis was made on clinical grounds and wasconfirmedbylaboratorytestsin16patients.Thehandswere the most common site of infection. Regionaladenitis was present in one third of patients. Erythemamultiforme was noted in 16 cases, and in two caseserythema multiforme bullosum was present. Electronmicroscopic examination of biopsy specimens showedthat viral particles were only found in the epidermisand that the number of virus-containing cells wasgreatest in the first 2 weeks after infection [8]. A studyfrom New Zealand in 1983 documented 231 orf patients in one year and recorded 18 patients with re-infection [9]. In North America human orf is a raredisease [10].The orf virus is transmissible to humans by directcontact with infected animals and occasionallythrough contaminated objects [3, 7, 11]. Instead of being reported simply as a professional disease, anepidemic outbreak of human orf may be observedafter the feast of sacrifice in Muslim countries [12].Duringthefeastsofsacrifice,the populationmaybe incontact with sheep and goats for a variety of reasons.In our cases transmission from goats and sheep tohumans was observed in the first 2 days of the feast inwhich animals were generally sacrificed.A single lesion or occasionally multiple lesions,develop at the site of contact, frequently an abrasionon the hand. The lesions are most commonly seen onnon-dominant hands as in our patients [12]. Theincubation period may continue from a few days to 1week with complaints of pain being minimal. Mildsystemic symptoms may occur with the lesion. Thedisease is self-limiting and spontaneous resolutionoften occurs within 6 weeks. Mendez & Burnettdescribed six distinct clinical stages of orf in detail:maculopapular, target, acute, regenerative, papillo-matous, and regressive [3, 11]. The maculopapularstage consists of an erythematous macule or papule.In the target stage, the lesion has a red centre, a cen-tral white ring, and an outer red halo. The acute stageconsists of an erythematous weeping nodule. In theregenerative stage, the lesion is dry with small blackdots on the outside surface. The papillomatous stageis characterized by papillomas appearing on thesurface. A dry crust characterizes the regressive stage.Residual scarring is unusual [11].Prompt diagnosis is easily made by obtaining acomplete patient history and by considering humanorf as a differential diagnosis when an unusual lesionis seen in an individual who has had contact withsheep or goats. Diagnosis is confirmed by pathologi-cal examination of an incisional biopsy specimen.Electron microscopy can help in establishing thediagnosis but is difficult in later stages of the disease,as proved in our cases. Isolation of the virus by tissueculture inoculation has proved to be difficult; andwe failed to do so. Serum analysis for antibodies isseldom used [2].Differential diagnoses include herpetic paronychialabscess,milker’snodules,cowpox,cutaneousanthrax,infection of   Mycobacterium marinum , deep fungal in-fections, pyogenic granulomas, keratoacanthoma andmalignant tumours [1–3, 13]. By case history, clinicalexamination and laboratory findings, exclusion of theenumerated lesions is not difficult.An awareness of orf is important since its course isbenign and does not require any specific treatment.Lesions generally heal without complication [3].Lymphangitis,lymphadenitisandgeneralmalaisewithfever can accompany the peripheral lesions. Reportedcomplications include superinfection, erythema Fig. 5.  The epidermis shows acanthosis with finger-likedownward projections and the dermis contains capillaryproliferation and mononuclear infiltrate (HE r 200). 656 M. Uzel and others  multiforme, chills, fever, and rare ophthalmic in-volvement [2, 4, 9]. In one of our cases, after spon-taneous resolution we observed paresthesia as aneurological complication and also limited movementand swan-neck deformity of the index finger as amusculoskeletal complication. These rare compli-cations were reported previously [14].Psychological support may be necessary as in twoof our cases. In the literature, the same event for asurgeon was also reported and physicians who areunfamiliar with human orf may misdiagnose suchrapidly growing tumours as malignant, leading toaggressive treatment such as an amputation. Savage& Black described a lesion on the finger of a patienttreated with immunosuppression due to lymphoma;the finger had to be amputated [15]. Two of our caseswere also exposed to unnecessary intervention.All sheep and goats should be considered as apotential source of infection. Veterinary control andpreventive measures are very important especially inthe meat industry [2, 3].We observed human orf in the hands of individualswho were not professional workers and believed thatthe cause was uncontrolled slaughtering of animals bynon-professional individuals during the feasts of sac-rifice. Information concerning orf should be given tothe relevant people and special attention should bepaid to the rules of slaughtering an animal. Humanorf is well recognized by dermatologists and otherphysicians, especially orthopaedic surgeons shouldalso recognize orf. It is important to consider humanorf as a differential diagnosis of hand lesions toprevent overtreatment and complications. REFERENCES 1.  Arnaud JP, Bernard P, Souyri N, Pecout C, Dunoyer J. Human ORF disease localized in the hand: a ‘falsefelon’. A study of eight cases. Ann Chir Main 1986;  5 :129–132.2.  Chahidi N, de Fontaine S, Lacotte B.  Human orf. Br JPlast Surg 1993;  46 : 532–534.3.  Zimmerman JL.  Orf. J Am Med Assoc 1991;  266 : 476.4.  Gill MJ, Arlette J, Buchan KA, Barber K.  Human orf.A diagnostic consideration? Arch Dermatol 1990;  126 :356–358.5.  Fowler JR.  Viral infections. Hand Clin 1989;  5 : 613– 627.6.  Newson IE, Cross F.  Sore mouth in sheep transmissableto man. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1934;  84 : 790–802.7.  Waldram MA.  A seven-year-old girl with orf of thehand. J Hand Surg [Br] 1986;  11 : 467–468.8.  Johannessen JV, Krogh HK, Solberg l, Dalen A, vanWijngaarden H, Johansen B.  Human orf. J CutanPathol 1975;  2 : 265–282.9.  Robinson AJ, Petersen GV.  Orf virus infection of workers in the meat industry. N Z Med J 1983;  96 :81–85.10.  Moore Jr. RM.  Human orf in the United States. J InfectDis 1972;  27 : 731–732.11.  Mendez B, Burnett JW.  Orf. Cutis 1989;  44 : 286–287.12.  Gunes AT, Gezen C, Kapdagli H, Marschall HJ. Ecthyma contagiosum epidemien in der Turkei.Hautarzt 1982;  33 : 384–387.13.  Friedmann PS, Wilkinson M.  Occupational dermatoses.In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP et al. eds.Dermatology. Spain: Mosby, 2003: 251–264.14.  Uzel M, Sasmaz S, Ozkul A, Cetinus E, Karaoguz A. Swan-neck deformity and paresthesia following giantorf. J Dermatol 2004;  31 : 116–118.15.  Savage J, Black MM.  ‘Giant’ orf of finger in a patientwith a lymphoma. Proc Roy Soc Med 1972;  65 : 766– 768. Human orf infection of the hand 657
Similar documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!