A 3-year cohort study of the natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Japan

Only a few prospective studies have determined which clinical symptoms and factors are associated with the disease severity of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). A multicenter longitudinal cohort study was conducted to clarify both the natural
of 8
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  RESEARCH Open Access A 3-year cohort study of the natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Japan Kenichi Yasui 1* , Ichiro Yabe 2 , Kunihiro Yoshida 3 , Kazuaki Kanai 4 , Kimihito Arai 5 , Mizuki Ito 6 , Osamu Onodera 7 ,Shigeru Koyano 8 , Eiji Isozaki 9 , Setsu Sawai 4 , Yoshiki Adachi 10 , Hidenao Sasaki 2 , Satoshi Kuwabara 4 , Takamichi Hattori 4 , Gen Sobue 6 , Hidehiro Mizusawa 11,12 , Shoji Tsuji 13 , Masatoyo Nishizawa 14 and Kenji Nakashima 1 Abstract Background:  Only a few prospective studies have determined which clinical symptoms and factors are associatedwith the disease severity of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). A multicenter longitudinal cohort study wasconducted to clarify both the natural history of SCA6 in Japan and the factors influencing disease progression. Methods:  Patients were consecutively recruited between 2007 and 2008. Scores from the Scale for the Assessmentand Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and Barthel Index (BI) were collected prospectively each year. Additionally, data fromthe Japan intractable diseases research (IDR) registry were collected both retrospectively, from 2003 to 2006, andprospectively, from 2007 to 2010. As a result, we were able to collect 3 years of retrospective data and 4 years of prospective data during the course of 3 yearly visits. Results:  Forty-six patients were registered. The follow-up rate of the third year was 93%. The SARA scores worsenedsignificantly each year. Over 3 years, the decline of the SARA scores was 1.33 ± 1.40 points/year. The results of multivariate analysis of the decline of the SARA score were not significant. The IDR scores correlated well withthe SARA and BI scores. Kaplan-Meier curves of 7 years of data from the IDR registry illustrated the correlationbetween the ability to walk and the time course of the disease. Conclusions:  Information regarding the progression of ataxia and the decline in the activities of daily living(ADL) in patients with SCA6 was obtained by a 3-year cohort study and a 7-year IDR study. The decline of theSARA score of patients with SCA6 was 1.33 ± 1.40 points/year. The results elucidate the natural history of SCA6,factors influencing disease severity, and utility of data from the IDR registry of Japan. Keywords:  Barthel Index, CAG repeat, International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale, Intractable diseasesresearch, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, Spinocerebellar ataxia Background The spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are neurodegenerativediseases characterized by oculomotor disturbances, dysarth-ria, limb and truncal ataxia, gait disturbances, and additional variable symptoms [1]. In the 1990 ’ s, genetic mappingstudies in patients with autosomal dominant cerebellarataxias (ADCAs) identified 7 polyglutamine diseases:SCA type 1 [SCA1], SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, SCA17,and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy [DRPLA] [2].Although numerous studies have described the clinicalmanifestations of the SCAs [2-4], very few prospectivestudies have examined which clinical symptoms and fac-tors are associated with disease severity. Knowledge of the natural history of the SCAs is required to counselpatients and to design interventional trials. One cohortstudy of SCA, the European EUROSCA natural history study, was a multicenter longitudinal study that included526 patients with SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, and SCA6 [5-8].A 2-year follow-up study of EUROSCA used severalscales, including the Scale for the Assessment and Rat-ing of Ataxia (SARA), to describe disease progressionand identify factors that specifically affected this process[8]. Recently, Ashizawa et al. reported the results of a * Correspondence: 1 Division of Neurology, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8504, JapanFull list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2014 Yasui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the srcinal work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public DomainDedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article,unless otherwise stated. Yasui  et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases  2014,  9 :118  prospective study of the natural history of the SCAs inthe United States [9]. We designed a multicenter longi-tudinal cohort study of the natural history of SCA6 inJapan. Our study used the SARA and the Barthel Index(BI). SCA6 was selected because of the high prevalenceof patients with this disease in Japan.In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfarehas established a national registry system for the survey of   ‘ intractable diseases ’  such as the SCAs [10,11]. TheMinistry is conducting a project that subsidizes the med-ical expenses of patients with an  ‘ intractable disease ’ .This project also supports research activities on thesediseases because effective treatments have not yet beenestablished and the affected patients have considerabledisabilities. Each year, patients with an  ‘ intractable dis-ease ’  submit a  ‘ clinical inquiry sheet, ’  which is completedby their physician, to the IDR. Since 2003, the inquiry sheet for patients with an SCA has included 5 itemsfrom the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale(ICARS) and 6 items from the BI [12,13]. The purposesof the IDR registry are to provide financial support forpatients and investigate the patients ’  clinical states; how-ever, data from the present IDR registry have not yetbeen utilized for longitudinal natural history studies.The primary aims of this study were to longitudinally and quantitatively investigate the clinical severity, dis-ease progression, and natural history of SCA6, to iden-tify factors that specifically affected disease progressionin a 3-year prospective study in Japan, and to comparethe results of this study with those of previous studies.The secondary aim was to examine the reliability andutility of the data collected by the Ministry of Health,Labour, and Welfare ’ s national IDR registry. Methods Patient registration The present study was performed at 8 centers (HokkaidoUniversity, Niigata University, Chiba University, NationalHospital Organization Chiba-East-Hospital, TokyoMetropolitan Neurological Hospital, Shinsyu University,Nagoya University, and Tottori University) belonging tothe Research Committee for Ataxic Disease. This commit-tee is part of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfareof Japan. The written informed consent form, which wasapproved by the institutional review board of all centersand by the Ethics Committee of the Tottori University Hospital, was signed by all study participants. Patientswith SCA6 who were being treated at any of the 8 centerswere consecutively recruited between 2007 and 2008. Alinkable, anonymizing registration system was used toregister all patients.The patients did not provide DNA samples for thisstudy and therefore diagnoses based on DNA analyseswere made in accordance with the protocols being usedat each center. Information regarding the CAG repeatlength of the expanded allele of the alpha 1A P/Q type voltage-dependent calcium channel gene ( CACNA1A ) of each patient was obtained from the medical records of the respective center. Procedures of the 3-year prospective study Registration and follow-up evaluations were performedfrom April to July during the annual registration periodof the Japan IDR registry; therefore, follow-up investiga-tions were performed at the same time each year. Aspart of the prospective study, all patients were assessedwith the SARA and the BI each year. The SARA wasused to assess the degree of ataxia. The SARA consistsof 8 items: gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger chase,nose-to-finger test, fast alternating hand movements,and heel-to-shin slide. Each item has its own subscore.The SARA grades ataxia on a scale of 0 to 40, with 0 in-dicating the absence of ataxia and 40 indicating the mostsevere degree of ataxia. The Japanese SARA is well vali-dated and can be administered quickly [14,15]. The BIwas used to assess how well a patient performs the activ-ities of daily living (ADL). The BI grades activity on ascale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating that a person cannotcare for him/herself and 100 indicating that a personcan care for him/herself. All investigators were board-certified neurologists and were experienced in the use of the applied scales. Procedures of the 7-year IDR registry study The IDR inquiry sheet for patients with an SCA includes5 items from the ICARS (walking, standing with eyesopen, body sway with feet together and eyes closed,knee-tibia test of the worse foot, and finger-to-nose testof the worse hand [decomposition and dysmetria]) and 6items from the BI (feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing,mobility, and stairs) [11-13]. The total number of pointsobtained from the IDR inquiry sheet for the 5 itemsfrom the ICARS and the 6 items from the BI was re-ferred to as the IDR-ICARS and IDR-BI scores, respect-ively. The IDR-ICARS grades ataxia on a scale of 0 to26, with 0 indicating the least impaired condition. TheIDR-BI grades activity on a scale of 0 to 55, with 0 indi-cating the most impaired condition. The 5 items of theIDR-ICARS were selected because these subscores cor-related well with disease duration in Japanese patientswith cerebellar ataxia [10].The IDR inquiry sheet was last modified in 2003. Forthe retrospective portion of the IDR registry study, wecollected the IDR inquiry sheets from 2003 onwards.The inquiry sheets were collected from the patients ’ medical records, starting in the year they registered forthe study. IDR data collection continued prospectively  Yasui  et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases  2014,  9 :118 Page 2 of 8  each year. The utility of the IDR registry was evaluatedby analyzing a total of 7 years ’  worth of data. Data analysis The differences between the scores obtained at registra-tion and those obtained at each year ’ s evaluation werereferred to as the  ∆  scores, and the differences betweenthe scores obtained at registration and the scores ob-tained at the last evaluation were referred to as the total ∆  scores. The total  ∆ /year was calculated by dividing thetotal  ∆  score by the number of follow-up years.Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSSStatistics software version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).The test results were considered significant at the .05level. The Mann – Whitney test was used to compare theclinical characteristics of the male and female patients.Correlations between clinical scores and covariates weretested by using the Pearson correlation test. Data for dis-ease progression were analyzed by using the Friedmantest followed by post hoc Wilcoxon signed rank tests.The rate at which patients became wheelchair dependentwas calculated from the data of the 7-year IDR registry study by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The CAG re-peat length of the normal  CACNA1A  allele of each pa-tient could not be collected in this study; therefore, weanalyzed the repeat lengths of the expanded alleles, withthe exception of the repeat lengths of the 3 patients whoare homozygous for the expanded allele. For the cross-sectional study, an analysis of covariance at registrationwas performed with the SARA score as the dependent variable and sex, age at onset, disease duration, andCAG repeat length of the expanded  CACNA1A  allele asindependent variables. For the prospective study, an ana-lysis of covariance was performed with the total  ∆ SARA/ year as the dependent variable and sex, age at onset, diseaseduration, CAG repeat length of the expanded  CACNA1A allele, and SARA score at registration as independent vari-ables. Age at registration was not included in the model, asage at registration was recorded as the sum of age at onsetand disease duration. The test results were considered sig-nificant at the .01 level for the multivariate analysis. Results Patient characteristics The study population consisted of 46 patients with SCA6who belonged to 44 families. The SARA and IDR-ICARSscores of female patients were significantly lower thanthose of male patients. Although the age at onset, age atregistration, and disease duration tended to be lower in fe-male patients than in male patients, the differences werenot statistically significant. Similarly, although the BI andIDR-BI scores of female patients tended to be higher thanthose of male patients, the differences were not statisti-cally significant (Table 1). Correlations between clinical scores and factors atregistration A patient ’ s age at the time of registration and the durationof his/her disease were correlated with clinical scores;however, a patient ’ s age at the time of disease onset andthe CAG repeat length of the expanded  CACNA1A  allelewere not correlated with those scores (Table 2).The patients ’  IDR-ICARS and IDR-BI scores corre-lated well with their SARA and BI scores, respectively (Figure 1A, B). The correlation coefficients of the SARAand IDR-ICARS scores and the BI and IDR-BI scoreswere 0.89 and 0.93, respectively (  P  <.001). The BI scoreswere inversely correlated with the SARA scores (R= − 0.83,  P  <.001). Patients with a SARA score of less than 10 pointsmaintained a high BI score. Conversely, among patientswith a SARA score of more than 10 points, those with ahigher SARA score had a lower BI score (Figure 1C).The results of multivariate analysis of the patients ’ SARA scores at the time of registration are presented inTable 3. An analysis of covariance with the SARA scoreas the dependent variable and clinical factors as inde-pendent variables produced multivariate models that ex-plained 39.5% of the variance of the SARA scores. TheSARA scores were influenced by sex, age at onset, Table 1 Demographic, genetic, and clinical characteristicsof the study population All patients MalepatientsFemalepatients No. 46 23 23Age at onset, y 48.0 ± 9.3 (31 – 66) 48.8 ± 10.0 47.2 ± 8.6Age at registration, y 63.0 ± 9.6 (41 – 78) 64.4 ± 10.0 61.5 ± 9.2Disease duration, y 15.0 ± 8.0 (3 – 40) 15.6 ± 7.5 14.3 ± 8.7SARA score, points(Range, 0 – 40)15.9 ± 7.1 (4 – 33) 18.2 ± 6.2 13.6 ± 7.3*BI score, points(Range, 0 – 100)77.4 ± 22.4 (15 – 100) 72.2 ± 23.0 82.6 ± 20.9IDR-ICARS score, points(Range, 0 – 26)14.8 ± 6.0 (5 – 26) 16.6 ± 5.6 13.1 ± 6.1*IDR-BI score, points(Range, 0 – 55)36.7 ± 15.1 (5 – 55) 33.5 ± 16.1 40.0 ± 13.7CAG repeat lengthof the expanded CACNA1A  allele a 23.2 ± 1.4 (21 – 27) 23.2 ± 1.3 23.3 ± 1.6 Where applicable, the values are given as the mean±standarddeviation (range).Abbreviations: BI=Barthel Index;  CACNA1A =alpha 1A P/Q type voltage-dependentcalcium channel gene; CAG = cytosine-adenine-guanine; ICARS = InternationalCooperative Ataxia Rating Scale; IDR=Intractable Diseases Research; SARA=Scalefor the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.IDR-BI=total points of 6 items from the BI assessed by the IDR registry.IDR-ICARS=total points of 5 items from the ICARS assessed by theIDR registry. a  Three patients are homozygous for the expanded allele (repeat lengths: 20,22, and 24). The mean±standard deviation was applied for 43 patientsheterozygous for the expanded allele (22 male and 21 female patients).*The scores of female patients were significantly lower than those of malepatients ( P  <.05, Mann – Whitney test). Yasui  et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases  2014,  9 :118 Page 3 of 8  disease duration, and CAG repeat length of the ex-panded  CACNA1A  allele. Findings of the 3-year prospective study The data obtained from the prospective study were usedto obtain information on disease progression. This infor-mation is presented in Table 4 (5 right most columns).During the 3-year follow-up period, 2 patients died and1 patient dropped out. The causes of the 2 deaths weresuffocation and aplastic anemia. One untraceable patientcould not continue to visit because of his disability. Thefollow-up rate of the third year was 93%. The total num-ber of evaluations for the prospective study was 177.The SARA scores worsened significantly each year. The ∆ SARA/year at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up evalua-tions was 1.35±1.70 (mean±SD), 1.39±1.39, and 1.24±1.06 points/year, respectively. The total  ∆ SARA/year was1.33±1.40 points/year. The  ∆ SARA/year was 1.08±0.92points/year for male patients and 1.56±1.71 points/yearfor female patients. The difference of the  ∆ SARA/year be-tween genders was not significant. Each year, the SARAscores of patients who scored between 0 and 24.5 pointschanged by similar amounts ( ∆ SARA/year=1.48±1.86points/y), but the amount of change was smaller for pa-tients with scores of more than 25 points ( ∆ SARA/year=0.48±1.42 points/y).Among the subscores of the SARA scale, the sub-scores for gait ( ∆ /year=0.27 points/y), stance ( ∆ /year=0.22 points/y), and fast alternating hand movements( ∆ /year=0.24 points/y) were worse than the 5 other sub-scores (sitting:  ∆ /year=0.10 points/y, speech:  ∆ /year=0.16 points/y, finger chase:  ∆ /year=0.06 points/y, nose-to-finger test:  ∆ /year=0.10 points/y, heel-to-shin slide: ∆ /year=0.10 points/y) at the third year. The results of multivariate analysis for the decline in the SARA scorewere not significant. Findings of the 7-year IDR registry study The data from the 7-year IDR registry study were used toanalyze disease progression. The results of this analysisare presented in Table 4 (last 4 rows). The  ∆ IDR-ICARS/ year of the prospective portion of the study (absolute value 0.66±1.28 points/y) was similar to that of the retro-spective portion (absolute value 0.60±1.59 points/y). TheIDR-ICARS scores changed linearly in the retrospectiveand prospective portions of the study. The regression co-efficient of the linear regression analysis was 0.63. Amongthe subscores of the IDR-ICARS scale, the subscore forwalking ( ∆ /year=0.23 points/y) was worse than the 4other subscores (standing:  ∆ /year=0.12 points/y, body sway:  ∆ /year=0.11 points/y, knee-tibia test:  ∆ /year=0.05points/y, and finger-to-nose test:  ∆ /year=0.07 points/y) atthe third year.Among the 46 patients with SCA6 who participated inthis study, 9 already used a wheelchair when they filedtheir first IDR inquiry sheet. During the 7-year study period of the IDR registry, 12 of the remaining 37 pa-tients became wheelchair dependent. Figure 2 panels Aand B show the rates at which patients became wheel-chair dependent. These rates are based on disease dur-ation and age, respectively. All patients with a diseaseduration of less than 8 years and patients who were younger than 51 years could walk during the entirestudy. During the course of the study, patients with adisease duration of more than 9 years and patients whowere older than 52 years gradually became wheelchairdependent. The medians of disease duration and age inpatients who needed to use a wheelchair were 24.0 years(95% confidence interval [95% CI], 12.8 - 35.2 y) and77.0 years (95% CI, 71.6 - 82.4 y), respectively. The 9 pa-tients who were wheelchair dependent when they filedtheir first IDR inquiry sheet had a disease duration of more than 11 years and an IDR-ICARS score of morethan 17 points, and all were older than 56 years. Discussion This 3-year prospective study elucidated the quantitativenatural history of SCA6 in Japan. Although several pre- vious studies have used a cross-sectional or retrospectivedesign to describe the clinical characteristics of SCA6[16-18], ours is the first to use SARA and BI scores toprospectively assess a Japanese cohort. Furthermore, thisstudy provides an accurate natural history of SCA6 be-cause of the high follow-up rate. Our success was pos-sible because the study was performed in 8 centersbelonging to the Research Committee for Ataxic Dis-ease. This committee is part of the Ministry of Health,Labour, and Welfare of Japan. In addition, the follow-up Table 2 Correlations between the SARA, IDR-ICARS, BI,and IDR-BI scores and patients ’  demographics SARA IDR-ICARS BI IDR-BI Age at onset NS NS NS NSAge at registration 0.36 b 0.43 c − 0.45 c − 0.57 c Disease duration 0.35 b 0.45 c − 0.35 b − 0.44 c CAG repeat length of theexpanded  CACNA1A  allele a NS NS NS NS Correlation coefficients are presented.Abbreviations: BI = Barthel Index;  CACNA1A  = the alpha 1A P/Q typevoltage-dependent calcium channel gene; CAG = cytosine-adenine-guanine;ICARS = International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale; IDR=Intractable DiseasesResearch; NS=not significant; SARA=Scale for the Assessment and Ratingof Ataxia.IDR-BI=total points of 6 items from the BI assessed by the IDR registry.IDR-ICARS=total points of 5 items from the ICARS assessed by theIDR registry. a Data on the CAG repeat length were analyzed for 43 patients heterozygousfor the expanded allele. b P  <.05 (statistical analysis conducted with the Pearson correlation test). c P  <.01 (statistical analysis conducted with the Pearson correlation test). Yasui  et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases  2014,  9 :118 Page 4 of 8  investigations were performed at the same time each year, during the annual registration period of the JapanIDR registry.Regrettably, one disadvantage of this study is thatDNA was not collected: only data for the CAG repeatlength of the expanded allele of the  CACNA1A  gene wasused in our analysis. We did not analyze the repeatlengths of the patients who are homozygous for the ex-panded  CACNA1A  allele. These data were collectedfrom the patients ’  medical records. Given that the gen-etic data of this study were partially limited, we empha-sized the clinical courses of the patients.The correlation analysis of the patients ’  clinical scoresand clinical factors revealed that a patient ’ s age at thetime of registration and the duration of his/her diseasewere correlated with the SARA score (Table 2). Theseresults and the corresponding correlation coefficientsare similar to those of previous reports [6]. Furthermore,the results of this study clarified the correlation betweenthe SARA and BI scores (Figure 1C). Among the 46 par-ticipants in this study, female patients tended to be younger and have a shorter disease duration than malepatients; however, the differences were not statistically significant. On the other hand, the SARA and IDR-ICARS scores of female patients were significantly less (B) BI Score    I   D   R  -   B   I   S  c  o  r  e 0 10020 40 60 800601030405020 (A) SARA Score    I   D   R  -   I   C   A   R   S   S  c  o  r  e 0 10 4030200103020 SARA Score    B   I   S  c  o  r  e (C) 0100204060800 10 403020 Figure 1  Relationships between the clinical scales used by theprospective study and by the IDR registry. (A)  The relationshipbetween the IDR-ICARS and SARA scales. The IDR-ICARS scorescorrelated well with the SARA scores (R = 0.892,  P   < .001, Pearsoncorrelation test).  (B)  The relationship between the IDR-BI and BIscales. The IDR-BI scores correlated well with the BI scores (R=0.928, P  <.001, Pearson correlation test).  (C)  The relationship between theSARA and BI scales. The BI scores were inversely correlated with theSARA scores (R= − 0.828,  P  <.001, Pearson correlation test). Abbreviations:BI=Barthel Index; ICARS=International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale;IDR=Intractable Diseases Research; SARA=Scale for the Assessment andRating of Ataxia. Table 3 Results of multivariate analysis for the SARAscore at registration R  2 P Effect Estimate SE   β  t P  0.395 .001Intercept  − 45.558 21.830 n/a  − 2.087 .044Sex  − 5.669 1.775  − .415  − 3.194 .003Age at onset .338 .117 .451 2.877 .007Disease duration .252 .122 .285 2.067 .046CAG repeat lengthof the expanded CACNA1A  allele2.132 .812 .421 2.627 .012 R 2 =Coefficient of determination;  β =standard coefficient.Abbreviations:  CACNA1A =alpha 1A P/Q type voltage-dependent calcium channelgene; CAG=cytosine-adenine-guanine; n/a=not applicable; SARA=Scale for theAssessment and Rating of Ataxia; SE=standard error. Yasui  et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases  2014,  9 :118 Page 5 of 8
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!