The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in Historic Perspective

12/15/12 Ev ernote Web 1/17 The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in Historic Perspective Saturday, December 15 2012, 11:55 AM The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in Historic Perspective Citation: Frixione, E (2006) History of Neuroscience: The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in Historical Perspective, IBRO History of Neuroscience [] Accessed: date Eugenio Frixione Introduction Neurons can be usually distinguished at once from most other
of 17
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  12/15/12 Evernote Web1/17 The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in HistoricPerspective Saturday, December 15 2012, 11:55 AM The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in Historic Perspective  Citation:Frixione, E (2006) History of Neuroscience: The Cytoskeleton of Nerve Cells in Historical Perspective , IBRO History of Neuroscience []Accessed: date  Eugenio Frixione Introduction Neurons can be usually distinguished at once from most other cells by their peculiar multi-branched shapes, which allow them to maximize their spatial reach and surface-to-volume ratioswhile keeping metabolically manageable individual sizes. Each of them is capable of departing somuch from the basic round form of cells, and of growing and sustaining their characteristic ramifiedmorphology, mainly because of the development of an intracellular framework constituted of filamentous structures collectively known as the cytoskeleton . Nowhere else are the advantagesof possessing this highly complex and versatile scaffolding, common to nearly all eukaryotic cells,more apparent than in neurons. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that its existence, chief components and functions were commonly found or first studied in nerve tissue. The history of how the biologically important concept of a cytoskeleton emerged is, therefore, from the verybeginning, to a large extent a history of the neurocytoskeleton (for a survey of how the generalnotion of an internal cell skeleton srcinated and evolved, see Frixione, 2000). The followingparagraphs will attempt to summarize the main chapters of this Odyssey. Precedents before the 19th century Ever since Antiquity, nerves have been regarded as conduits for some sort of vehicle that rapidlycarries information between different parts of the animal body, typically communicatingimpressions from the sense organs to the brain as well as commands from the latter to themuscles. The carrier itself was srcinally conceived as a special mixture of air and fire called  pneuma (see Solmsen, 1961; Temkin, 1977), a term later on Latinized as spirits (e.g. Descartes,1664), which would flow within the nerves just as the blood streams along arteries and veins, onlymuch faster despite the former being in general considerably narrower passages. Several varietiesand even doubts started to appear on this model since the Renaissance (reviewed by Clarke,1968, 1978), yet it was rather surprising that the first microscopical inspections of nerves failed toshow any clear ducts in them (Malpighi, 1666; van Leeuwenhoek, 1674). Fortunately, however, acloser look with presumptively improved optics revealed that the nerves are actually composed of  very minute vessels of an incredible thinness ... [i.e. axons] ... running along by the sides of eachother ... [and that] the cavity of each of these small vessels is about two thirds its diameter   12/15/12 Evernote Web… (van Leeuwenhoek, 1717; see also Van der Loos, 1967; Brazier, 1984). However, the first knownmicroscopical examination of the contents of such tiny tubes, carried out more than 60 yearslater, produced results that were deemed quite incompatible with the supposedly swift flow of  spirits or any other thin fluid along the nerves. As judged from the soft dough that could beextruded from transversely cut nerves, the primitive cylinders were filled with a glutinous,elastic, transparent material, which [...] seemed to be formed of granular filaments, tenacious andelastic, which the water could neither dissolve nor separate (Fontana, 1782). The Classic Period The number of opinions about the fillings of the small cylinders and globules seen to constitute thebulk of all nervous tissues increased along with the expansion of microscopical research in the19th century. Yet the two main themes that were to dominate the scene can be found exemplifiedin descriptions provided already in the mid-1820s by two French authors: whereas René-JoachimDutrochet (1824) could only see a fluide diaphane within nerve fibers of the frog, Henri Milne-Edwards (1825) believed those of the rabbit to contain or be composed of fibres élémentaires ,themselves consisting of long chains of diminutive globules. Rapidly evolving technical skills andquality in optics - particularly the introduction of achromatic objectives - paved the way for morereliable observations and further controversy. The longitudinal cavity originally described in nervefibers (van Leeuwenhoek, 1717; see above) was now found clearly visible as a transparent primitive band coursing throughout the core of certain (myelinated) nerve fibers of vertebrates(Remak, 1838). But whereas such cell-cavity appeared just to be filled by a firm substance according to Theodor Schwann (1839), the corresponding axial region of the wider nerve fibers of some invertebrates was described by Robert Remak (1843) as containing an uninterrupted bundleof very delicate filaments or fibrils. Furthermore, when at least some of those nerve fibers weredemonstrated to be tubular processes anastomosed to, and therefore continuous with, nearbyglobules or nerve cells, the central fibrillar bundle within a given nerve fiber would occasionally beseen to reach into the body of an associated cell, and form therein concentric layers of fibrilsaround the nucleus (Remak, 1844; see Figure 1). Figure 1: One of the first two known illustrations of the cytoskeleton shows a ganglion cell of thecrayfish nerve cord, in which concentric layers of delicate fibrils appear surrounding the nucleusand converging as they enter the axon. The fragile fibrils tend to break down as free grains nearthe cut end of the axon (Figure 9 in Remak, 1844).Inconsistencies in the descriptions of internal fine structure in nerve fibers and cells would occureven in the writings of a single author. The highly respected Albrecht von Kölliker, for example, atfirst interpreted the axial primitive band as obviously quite solid, most generally homogeneous,   12/15/12 Evernote Web3/17… but not infrequently also, faintly striated or very finely granular ... and also perhaps with anirregular, even jagged border (von Kölliker, 1852). It was already evident at the time that at leastsome of these differences might be attributable to an inherent lability of the fibrillary material,which on account of its great fragility breaks down easily into a powdery mass (Remak, 1844, p.469). There were specific warnings about this susceptibility: The fibrils rarely appear as straightdelicate filaments [...] The lightest pressure, the smallest displacement, breaks and bends themabout in various ways, so that with the usual magnifications of 300-600 they always have aslightly granulated appearance (Waldeyer, 1863). When properly selected and handled, however,some nervous tissues displayed such well-ordered arrangements of protoplasmic fibrils that theiractual reality could hardly be doubted. A prime example of this was offered by the large ganglioncells of the torpedo fish, which removed from the living animal, and prepared in serum, in which they were capable of being easilyisolated, possess, both in their processes and in their proper substance, an exquisitely delicatefibrillar structure [...] giving the impression that the whole mass of fibrils given off by ganglion cellsonly traverse it [...] and thus the fibrils which are seen traversing the substance of the ganglioncell do not srcinate in the cell, but only undergo a kind of arrangement in it, and then pass to theaxis-cylinder process, or extend into the other branched processes (Schultze, 1869; see Figure2). Figure 2:  According to Max Schultze, the fibrils merely undergo a rearrangement or change indirection within nerve cells that have multiple branched processes, like this ganglion cell of thetorpedo fish (Figure 30 in Schultze, 1869; here rotated 90 o clockwise).Nevertheless, caution was strongly recommended in accepting this picture (Heitzmann, 1883).Moreover, the contents of the large nerve fibers in the ganglionic chain of the crayfish, i.e. thevery animal in which the fibrils had been discovered by Remak almost 40 years earlier (see above),were described as perfectly pellucid, and without the least indication of structure (Huxley,1880). In other words, the dispute over the existence of fibrils threatened to persist endlessly. One author thinks of the nerve cell as granulated, the other as fibrillose; one thinks of the nervefiber as a bunch of fibrils but another as a liquid column, expressed an understandably frustratedSigmund Freud (quoted by Jones, 1953), who also investigated the matter himself while he was aresearch student in the laboratory of Ernst von Brücke at the Institute of Physiology in theUniversity of Vienna. His own unambiguous conclusion after thoroughly inspecting again thecrayfish nerve cells and fibers was clearly put in one of his last papers on basic science: Thenerve cells in the brain and in the ventral ganglionic chain consist of two substances, of whichone, arranged like a network, is [found also] in the fibrils of the nerve fibres; the other extendshomogeneously as the interstitial substance itself (Freud, 1882; see Figure 3 and Frixione, 2003).  12/15/12 Evernote Web4/17… Figure 3:  The young Sigmund Freud decided to inspect again the ganglion cells and fibers of thecrayfish nerve cord to determine, under the strictest conditions, the truth about the existence of the controversial fibrils described by Remak more than 40 years earlier. His own observationsconfirmed Remak's findings (Figure 2 in Freud, 1882; cf. Figure 1 above).Skepticism about the reality of fibrils in the protoplasm of nerve cells and fibers, due to a largeextent to their very brief persistence in excised living material before degradation started,diminished following the appearance of a relatively reliable method for staining them in fixed nervetissue (Kupffer, 1883). Acceptance was also helped by reports of filaments or fibrils in otherinstances, such as cells undergoing division (Flemming, 1880), egg cells (van Beneden, 1883), andsperm flagella (Jensen, 1887; Ballowitz, 1890). As staining procedures improved, however, a newcontroversy erupted, this time concerning the function of the fibrils in the nervous system. Notonly was their presence reported in an increasing number of animal species, but in addition crisplystained fibrils could be seen coursing their way through long stretches of nerve fibers in favorablepreparations taken from invertebrates (von Apáthy, 1897; Bethe, 1898b), as well as fromvertebrates (Bethe, 1898a). These findings gained new credibility for a physiological hypothesisthat had been put forward srcinally by Max Schultze (1869), namely that the fibrils, henceforthknown as neurofibrils (Bethe, 1900), might be the actual conducting pathways for the nerveimpulses (see Figure 4). Figure 4: Fibrils coursing across a large cell in the nerve cord of a dog. Some authors, such asApáthy and Bethe, concluded that neurofibrils could be the actual pathways for the conduction of 


Jul 27, 2017

e 0363036

Jul 27, 2017
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!