Taxes & Accounting

Coherent tunnelling across a quantum point contact in the quantum Hall regime

Coherent tunnelling across a quantum point contact in the quantum Hall regime
of 5
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  Coherent tunnelling across a quantumpoint contact in the quantum Hall regime F. Martins 1 , S. Faniel 1,2 , B. Rosenow  3 , H. Sellier  4 , S. Huant  4 , M. G. Pala 5 , L. Desplanque 6 , X. Wallart  6 , V. Bayot  1,4 & B. Hackens 1 1 IMCN/NAPS, Universite´ catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve B-1348, Belgium,  2 ICTEAM/ELEN, Universite´ catholique deLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve B-1348, Belgium,  3 Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leipzig University, Leipzig D-04009, Germany, 4 Institut Ne´el, CNRS and Universite´ Joseph Fourier, Grenoble F-38042, France,  5 IMEP-LAHC, Grenoble INP, Minatec, Grenoble F- 38016, France,  6 IEMN, Cite´ scientifique, Villeneuve d’Ascq F-59652, France. Theuniquepropertiesofquantumhalldevicesarisefromtheidealone-dimensionaledgestatesthatforminatwo-dimensionalelectronsystemathighmagneticfield.Tunnellingbetweenedgestatesacrossaquantumpoint contact (QPC) has already revealed rich physics, like fractionally charged excitations, or chiralLuttinger liquid. Thanks to scanning gate microscopy, we show that a single QPC can turn into aninterferometerforspecificpotentiallandscapes.Spectroscopy,magneticfieldandtemperaturedependencesof electron transport reveal a quantitatively consistent interferometric behavior of the studied QPC. Toexplain this unexpected behavior, we put forward a new model which relies on the presence of a quantumHall island at the centre of the constriction as well as on different tunnelling paths surrounding the island,thereby creating a new type of interferometer. This work sets the ground for new device concepts based oncoherent tunnelling. E lectron phase coherence is the cornerstone of quantum devices and computation 1,2 . In that perspective,Quantum Hall (QH) devices are particularly attractive in view of their large coherence times 3 . QuantumHall edge states (ES) formed by Landau levels (LL) crossing the Fermi energy near sample borders are idealone-dimensional (1D) systems in which scattering vanishes exponentially at low temperature  T  1,4 . Edge stateloops surrounding potential hills or wells, referred to as localized states or quantum Hall islands (QHIs), thenform unique zero-dimensional (0D) systems 5 . The last few years witnessed great progresses in the transportspectroscopy of model QH localized states created by patterning quantum dots 6 or antidots 7–9 in a two-dimen-sional electron system (2DES).Inparallel,newtoolsweredevelopedtoprobethemicroscopicstructureofconfinedelectronsystemsintheQHregime. Inparticular, scanning gate microscopy  10–16 (SGM) makes use of a movable metallic tip, which is voltage-biased, to finely tune the electrons’ confining potential in its vicinity. This way, the geometry of propagating edgestates and localized states can be modified at will 17 . Very recently, SGM allowed us to locate active QHIs in a QHinterferometer 18 . Importantly, it appeared that QHIs do not only form around antidots, but potential inhomo-geneities also induce QHIs in the arms or near the constrictions connecting a quantum ring to source and drainreservoirs 18 . Therefore, lateral confinement, e.g. in quantum point contacts (QPC), offers the possibility toconnect a QHI to ES through tunnel junctions, and thus form a new class of 1D-0D-1D QH devices (Fig. 1).Inthiscase,the0Dislandischaracterizedbyaweakcoupling( s = e 2 / h )andalargechargingenergy( E  c  5 e 2 / C  ? k B T  )( C  istheislandcapacitance),whichinduceCoulombblockade(CB) 1 .Insuchdevices,Aharonov-Bohm(AB)likeoscillations oftheresistance canbeexplained byCoulombcoupling betweenfullyoccupied LLsandconfinedstates in the QHI 7,18–22 . It was also suggested that AB oscillations reported on a QPC 23 could be attributed totunnelling paths around the saddle point 24 . In contrast, transport through QH devices, but in the strong coupling limit ( s ? e 2 / h ), revealed coherent effects analog to those observed in optical Mach-Zehnder 3,25,26 or Fabry-Pe´rot 22,27–32 interferometers.Here, we examine an unexplored regime of transport across a QPC where QH edge states are weakly coupled,but phase coherence is preserved. The SGM tip is used as a nanogate to tune the potential landscape and henceedge states’ pattern and coupling. At first sight, one expects that transport should be driven by tunnelling, andpossibly by Coulomb blockade if a quantum Hall island were mediating transport between edge states (Fig. 1) 18 .Indeed, SGM and magnetoresistance data corroborate with Coulomb blockade across a QHI located near thesaddle point of the QPC. However, temperature dependence and scanning gate spectroscopy show clear SUBJECT AREAS: ELECTRONIC ANDSPINTRONIC DEVICESELECTRONIC DEVICESQUANTUM HALLELECTRONIC PROPERTIES ANDMATERIALS Received21 December 2012 Accepted22 February 2013Published11 March 2013 Correspondence andrequests for materialsshouldbeaddressedtoF.M. ( or B.H. ( SCIENTIFIC  REPORTS  | 3 : 1416 | DOI: 10.1038/srep01416  1  signatures of quantum interferences. Since, up to now, such interfer-ences were exclusively observed in open QH devices, this observationsetsthe stage for a new electrontransportscenario. Wepropose a new model that provides a quantitative interpretation of the data. Results Our sample is a QPC etched in an InGaAs/InAlAs heterostructureholding a 2DES 25 nm below the surface. The QPC lithographicwidth is 300 nm. All the experiments were performed at  T  between 4.2 K and 100 mK, in a dilution refrigerator. Here, theperpendicular magnetic field  B  ,  9.5 T, which corresponds to aLL filling factor  n  ,  6 in the 2DES. The SGM experiment isschematically depicted in Fig. 1. It consists in scanning a metallicatomic force microscope tip, polarized at voltage  V  tip , along aplane parallel to the 2DES at a tip-2DES distance of 50 nm whilerecording a map of the device resistance  R 13,14 . The QPC resistanceis defined as  R  5  dV  / dI  , where  V   and  I   are the voltage and thecurrent through the device, respectively.The 2DES being on a quantized Hall plateau, whenever somecurrent tunnels between opposite edge channels,  R  deviates fromthe zero value expected in QH systems at very low   T  4,18,33 . In ourcase, the SGM resistance map recorded at  B 5 9.5 T,  V  tip 52 4 Vand  T  5 4.2 K and presented in Fig. 2(a) reveals concentric fringessuperimposed on a slowly varying background. The srcin of thebackground, related to reflection of ES at the QPC, is discussed inthe supplementary information. The fringe pattern can easily beunderstood in the presence of a QHI surrounding a potential hill,close to the saddle point of the QPC and tunnel-coupled to thepropagatingES(Fig.1).Indeed,approachingthepolarizedtipgradu-allychangesthepotentialoftheQHI,andhenceitsarea  A ,definedasthesurfaceenclosed bythe‘‘looping’’ES.Theenclosedmagnetic flux  w  varies accordingly and the tip generates iso- w  lines when circling around the QHI. Since adding one flux quantum  w 0  corresponds totrapping one electron per populated LL in the island, CB oscillationsare generated whenever  B  or  A  are varied 21 , thereby producing AB-like oscillations 7,18–20,22 . Isoresistance lines visible on Fig. 2(a) are,therefore, iso- w  lines that are crossed as the tip-island distance is varied 18 . Consequently, the center of concentric fringes in Fig. 2(a)indicates the position of the active QHI, which connects oppositepropagating edge channels through tunnel junctions (Fig. 1).In the framework of this model, the area of the QHI can be deter-mined thanks to the  B -dependence of AB-like oscillations 21 : D B ~ w 0 =  A ð Þ = N   ð 1 Þ where  N   is the number of completely filled LL in the bulk (here  N  5 6). The combined effect of moving the tip along the dashed line inFig. 2(a) and changing   B  is illustrated in Fig. 2(b) for  V  tip 52 6 V.Along the  B -axis, AB-like oscillations are highlighted with the whitedashed lines. The negatively polarized tip approaching the QHIraises its potential, which increases its area  A , and hence reducesthe magnetic field that separates two resistance peaks  D B . This isillustrated in Fig. 2(c), where we assume that the QHI has a surfaceequivalenttothatofadiskwithdiameter d  obtainedfromEq.(1): d  isfoundtoincreasefrom , 65 nmto , 95 nmasthetip-islanddistance d x   decreases from 1300 nm to 300 nm, respectively. Noteworthy, asexpected for Coulomb dominated transport in a QH interferometer,increasing   B  isequivalent toapplying a morenegative  V  tip , yielding apositive  dV  tip / dB  for isoresistance stripes 22,31,32 . Since approaching the negatively charged tip has the same effect as decreasing   V  tip ,Fig. 2(b) seems consistent with the Coulomb dominated transport.But, surprisingly, the temperature dependence of fringes amplitude( d R , measured on SGM maps), shown on Fig. 3, reveals a peculiarbehaviour: it clearly does not follow the  T  2 1 dependence expected inthe quantum regime of CB 18,34,35 (data from ref. 18 are presented forcomparison in Fig. 3). Instead,  d R  deceases very slowly from 100 mKto 4.2 K. Indeed, for coherent transport through a Fabry-Pe´rot geo-metry, thermal smearing of interference gives rise to a temperaturedependence  d R ( T  ) , exp( 2 T  / T  0 ) in the low temperature regime. Incontrast,for transport processes involving a weaklycoupled Coulombisland, this form for  d R ( T  ) is expected only for temperatures largerthan the charging energy  32 . In the Fabry–Pe´rot situation,  T  0  is linkedto the excited states level spacing   D E  Ex   according to the relation  T  0 5 D E  Ex  / k B  5  2  v  ES /( dk B ) where  v  ES  is the local edge state velocity,related to the gradient of the confining potential. From experimentaldata measured in a GaAs QH Fabry-Pe´rot interferometer 29 , one caninfer that, in our sample, 5 3 10 4 m/s , v  ES , 10 5 m/s. Given thisrange for  v  ES , and  d  , 80 nm (from Fig. 2(c), taking into account thatthe  T  -dependence data were measured at  d x  , 630 nm), we obtainthe range of   T  -dependence represented as a gray region in Fig. 3,which reproduces quite well the behaviour observed experimentally.The corresponding range of 9.5 K , T  0 , 19.1 K is consistent withthe low temperature limit and hence with a Fabry-Pe´rot behaviour. Figure 1  |  Schematic representation of our model and experimentalsetup.  Tunnelling paths (dotted lines) connect opposite ES throughaquantumHallisland(circle).Current-carryingcontacts(1–2)andvoltageprobes (3–4) allow resistance measurements. (only one edge state isrepresented for the sake of clarity).  Figure 2  |  Imaging tunnelling across a QPC.  (a) SGM map at B  5 9.5 T, T  5 4.2 K, and V  tip 52 4 V. Continuous lines correspond to the edges of the QPC. The black bar represents 1  m m. (b)  B  -dependence of   R  -profilesover the region marked with a dashed line in (a), with V  tip 52 6 V. UsingEq. (1) for the two consecutive fringes highlighted with the white dashedlines in (b), we calculate in (c) the diameter of the QHI as the tip-QHIdistance  d x   is varied. scientificreports SCIENTIFIC  REPORTS  | 3 : 1416 | DOI: 10.1038/srep01416  2  Earlier experiments already evidenced such an exponential decay with temperature, but only in Mach-Zehnder and ballistic devices,which are known to be coherent 30,36,37 .However,ourmainobservationconfirmingthepreservedelectronphase coherence emerges from the analysis of non-linear transportthroughtheQPC.Scanninggatespectroscopyisrealizedbyposition-ing the tip right above the QHI, and sweeping both  V  tip  and the dccurrent  I   through the QPC. The voltage across our tunnel device, i.e.between propagating edge states, is the Hall voltage:  V  bias  5  h /( e 2 N  * ) I  33 , where  N  *  is the (integer) number of transmitted ES at theQPC (Fig. S1 - supplementary material). The measurement config-uration is indeed identical to that used to perform conventionalelectrical spectroscopy on isolated quantum dots. If the QHI wereweakly tunnel-coupled to the propagating edge states, one wouldexpect to observe a ‘‘Coulomb diamond’’ pattern 38 . Fig. 4(a) shows dR / dV  tip  as a function of the dc component of   V  tip  and  V  bias . Insteadof Coulomb diamonds, the spectroscopy displays a checkerboardpattern of maxima and minima, indicating that both  V  tip  and  V  bias tunetheinterferenceoftransitingelectrons.Eachbiasindependently adds a phase shift between interfering paths, so that the transresis-tance is modulated by a product of cosines and an exponential termaccounting for a voltage-dependent dephasing induced by electronsinjected at an energy   e j V  bias j 29,30,36,39 : dRdV  tip ~ D cos 2 p  V  bias D V  bias   cos 2 p  V  tip D V  tip z Q   exp  { 2 p c  V  bias D V  bias   n   , ð 2 Þ where  D  is the zero-bias visibility of the oscillations,  D V  tip  is theoscillation period induced by   V  tip ,  Q  is a constant phase factor, D V  bias  5  4  v  ES /( ed  ) is the oscillation period along the  V  bias  axis,and  c  is directly related to the  V  bias -dependent dephasing rate: t { 1 Q  ~ c  e V  bias j jð Þ = 2  29 .  n  varies from 1 to 2 according to Ref. 29, 30,36, 39 and was set to 1 as we could not discriminate from fitting thedata.AsshowninFigs.4(b–d),weobtainanexcellentfitofthedatainFig. 4(a) using Eq. (2) with a transist time t t  5 d  / v  ES 5 1.7 3 10 2 12 s,and a parameter  c 5 0.2 in the range found in Ref. 29. Note that insuch a small QHI,  t t   turns out to be smaller by at least one order of magnitude than the intrinsic  t Q  in the same 2DES 40 . This renderscoherentresonanttunnellingthroughthewholeQHIdevicepossible. Discussion Tointerpret D V  tip obtainedfromthefit,onefirstnotesthat R evolves very similarly when changing either  V  tip  or  B  in the vicinity of   B 5 9 T (Fig. S2 - supplementary material). Therefore, one can convert D V  tip  into an equivalent  D B , through a lever arm  D B / D V  tip  5 0.108 T/V. Hence,  D V  tip  5  0.46 V corresponds to  D B  5  50 mTfor the AB-like oscillations. In that range of   V  tip ,  N  *  5  5(Fig. S1(d)). This means that  d  ~ 2  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi w 0 =  p N   D B ð Þ p   ~ 145 nm, con-sistent with data in Fig. 2(c) since  d   is at a maximum when the tip isabove the QHI ( d x  5 0). Moreover, given the value of   t t  5 1.7 3 10 2 12 s found in fitting the spectroscopy data, one obtains  v  ES 5 8.5 3 10 4 m/s, within the range of values that was expected from data inref. 29, and in agreement with the exponential temperature depend-ence in Fig. 3. We therefore have a fully consistent picture thatexplains all magnetoresistance, temperature dependence and spec-troscopy data, and shows that tunnelling across the QHI is indeedcoherent.One fundamental question remains: why do we observe two dis-tinctbehavioursoftransportthroughapparentlysimilarQHdevices,Coulomb blockaded transport in our previous work  18 , and coherenttransport in this one? The qualitative difference cannot be explainedby the fact that  d   is smaller than previously examined QHIs.  T  0  and D V  bias  would be reduced proportionally, but not enough to explainthe observed  T  -dependence and spectroscopy. On the other hand,signs of coherent transport through CB quantum dots were only  Figure 4  |  Evidence for coherent transport in spectroscopy.  (a)  dR  / dV  tip as a function of the dc component of   V  tip  and  V  bias  at  B  5 9.5 T and T  5 100 mK. Voltage modulation of   V  tip  was set to 50 mV. (b) 2D fit of  dR  / dV  tip  using Eq. (2). (c–d) Transresistance vs  V  bias  taken along the red(c) and blue (d) dashed lines in (a–b). The circles correspond to theexperimental data and the continuous lines to the fit. Figure 3  |  Temperature dependence : Coulomb blockade vs coherenttransport.  d R   vs  T   obtained from SGM maps with  V  tip 52 1 V (circles)and from data in ref. 18 (squares). The dashed line corresponds to a  T  2 1 dependence. The gray region corresponds to an exponential dependenceexp( 2 T  / T  0 ) with 9.5 K , T  0 , 19.1 K, consistent with magnetoresistancedata and edge state velocity estimate along Ref. 29. The solid linecorresponds to  T  0 5 16.2 K, consistent with the spectroscopy data (seetext). scientificreports SCIENTIFIC  REPORTS  | 3 : 1416 | DOI: 10.1038/srep01416  3  obtained for symmetric tunnel junctions 34 that allow resonanttunnelling instead of sequential tunnelling. In that framework, onemight thus ascribe the loss of electron coherence in other QHIs to anasymmetry of tunnel junctions. However, a difference in the trans-mission coefficients  T  c   of the tunnel barriers may point towards analternative explanation. In the coherent regime, we find a ratherstrong coupling between the QHI and propagating ES (0.27  ,  T  c  , 0.43), which contrasts with the Coulomb blockade regime where T  c  = 1 41 .Asimilartrendisobservedintransportexperiments at B 5 0 T on carbon nanotubes 42 : phase coherence is maintained whenelectrons tunnel through barriers with a large transmission coef-ficient, so that interference effects can be observed.Up to this point, our analysis is based on the presence of a QHInear the QPC, connected to propagating ES on both sides throughtunnellingpaths(Fig.1).However,onecouldimaginethepresenceof additionaltunnellingpathsbetweenpropagatingES,inthevicinityof the QPC saddle point. The resulting model is presented in Fig. 5(a–b).Whilethe‘‘green’’pathsoccurnaturallywhenpropagatingESandtheQHIarecloseenough,the‘‘red’’pathsmayoriginatefrompoten-tialanharmonicities( i.e. nonparabolicity)onbothsidesofthesaddlepoint, similar to the fast potential variations suggested in Ref. 24. Inthis model, transport depends in principle on the various tunnelling probabilities,denoted T  1,2 and T  3,4 inFig.5.However,thepresenceof the QHI should always induce oscillations in the magnetoresistanceand spectroscopy of the QPC, either because it is enclosed in aninterferometer, created by the ‘‘red’’ paths and propagating ES, when T  1,2 , T  3,4 , or because tunnelling occurs directly through it ( T  1,2 . T  3,4 ) as discussed above (Fig. 1). Therefore, whichever  T  1,2  or  T  3,4 dominates,transportisstillcontrolledbythefluxtrappedintheQHIand hence its Coulomb charging, so that the analysis developedabove to extract parameters from the magnetoresistance and spec-troscopy are still valid. In that case, i. e.  T  3,4 . T  1,2 , the amplitude of the fringes leads us to 0.043  ,  T  3,4  ,  0.078 (for details seeSupplementary Information).In summary, we report first evidence for preserved electron phasecoherence in tunnelling across a quantum point contact in thequantum Hall regime. We propose a framework that explains allmagnetoresistance, temperature dependence and spectroscopy data.Thisscenarioreliesonthepresenceofapotentialhillthatgeneratesaquantum Hall island near the saddle point of the QPC. Our datatherefore provide new signatures of coherent tunnelling in anultra-small QH device. Methods Device fabrication and 2DES parameters .  Our device is fabricated from a InGaAs/InAlAs heterostructure grown by molecular beam epitaxy where a 2DES is confined25 nm below the surface (the layer sequence of this heterostructure is detailed in 13,14 ).The QPC was patterned using e-beam lithography followed by wet etching. The QPCresistance  R  is measured in a four-probe configuration: a low-frequency (typically 10to 20 Hz) oscillating current  I   is driven between contacts 1 and 2 on Fig. 1, and  V   ismeasured between contacts 3 and 4 using a lock-in technique, with  V   across the QPCalwayslessthan k B T/e .NexttotheQPC,wepatternedaHallbarwherewemeasuredalow- T   electron density and mobility of 1.4 3 10 16 m 2 2 and 4 m 2 /Vs, respectively. SGM and SGS techniques .  All the experiments are carried out inside a  3 He/ 4 Hedilution refrigerator where a home-made cryogenic atomic force microscope (AFM)was integrated 18 . The AFM is based on a quartz tuning fork to which a commercialmetallized Si cantilever (model CSC17 from MikroMasch) is glued by means of aconductive silver epoxy. We image the sample topography by imposing a feedback loop on the shift in the tuning fork resonant frequency and using standard dynamicAFM mode of operation. After locating the QPC we perform SGM. It consists of scanningthetipalongaplaneparalleltothe2DESatconstantdistanceof25 nmfromthe surface, i.e. 50 nm from the 2DES, with a bias voltage  V  tip  applied to the tip andrecording simultaneously the device resistance  R . At the end of a set of SGMexperiments, we image the topography of the QPC to ensure that, during that period,the position of the QPC did not change. The SGS is performed by positioning theAFM tip at a fixed position in the vicinity of the QHI and by adding a dc current  I   tothelock-inacsignalbetweencontacts1and2(Fig.1).Thevoltagebetweenedgestates V  bias  is obtained by multiplying the dc current  I   by   h /( e 2 N  * ). The transresistance  dR / dV  tip  is measured with a second lock-in using an ac modulation of   V  tip .1. Beenakker, C. W. J. & van Houten, H. Quantum transport in semiconductornanostructures.  Solid State Physics  44 , 1–228 (1991).2. Fischer, J. & Loss, D. Dealing with decoherence.  Science  324 , 1277–1278 (2009).3. Roulleau,P. etal  .DirectmeasurementofthecoherencelengthofedgestatesintheInteger quantum Hall regime.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  100 , 126802 (2008).4. Huckestein, B. Scaling theory of the integer quantum Hall effect.  Rev. Mod. Phys. 67 , 357–396 (1995).5. Ilani, S.  et al  . The microscopic nature of localization in the quantum Hall effect. Nature  427 , 328–332 (2004).6. Altimiras, C.  et al  . Non-equilibrium edge-channel spectroscopy in the integerquantum Hall regime.  Nature Phys.  6 , 34–39 (2009).7. Sim, H.-S., Kataoka, M. & Ford, C. J. B. Electron interactions in an antidot in theinteger quantum Hall regime.  Phys. Rep.  456 , 127–165 (2008).8. Goldman, V. J. & Su, B. Resonant tunnelling in the quantum Hall regime:measurement of fractional charge.  Science  267 , 1010–1012 (1995).9. Maasilta, I. J. & Goldman, V. J. Energetics of quantum antidot states in thequantum Hall regime.  Phys. Rev. B  57 , R4273–R4276 (1998).10. Topinka, M. A.  et al  . Imaging coherent electron flow from a quantum pointcontact.  Science  289 , 2323–2326 (2000).11.Crook, R., Smith, C. G.,Simmons, M. Y.& Ritchie, D.A. Imaging cyclotron orbitsand scattering sites in a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas.  Phys. Rev. B 62 , 5174–5178 (2000).12.Pioda,A. etal  .Spatiallyresolvedmanipulationofsingleelectronsinquantumdotsusing a scanned probe.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  93 , 216801 (2004).13. Hackens, B.  et al  . Imaging and controlling electron transport inside a quantumring.  Nature Phys.  2 , 826–830 (2006).14. Martins, F.  et al  . Imaging electron wave functions inside open quantum rings. Phys. Rev. Lett.  99 , 136807 (2007).15.Pala, M. G.  etal  . Local densityof states in mesoscopic samples from scanning gatemicroscopy.  Phys. Rev. B  77 , 125310 (2008).16.Pala,M.G. etal  .Scanninggatemicroscopyofquantumrings:effectsofanexternalmagnetic field and of charged defects.  Nanotechnology   20 , 264021 (2009).17. Paradiso, N.  et al  . Spatially resolved analysis of edge-channel equilibration inquantum Hall circuits.  Phys. Rev. B  83 , 155305 (2011).18. Hackens, B.  et al  . Imaging Coulomb islands in a quantum Hall interferometer. Nature Comm.  1 , 39 (2010).19. Taylor, R. P.  et al  . Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in the Coulomb blockade regime. Phys. Rev. Lett.  69 , 1989–1992 (1992).20. Kataoka, M.  et al  . Detection of Coulomb charging around an antidot in thequantum Hall regime.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  83 , 160–163 (1999).21. Rosenow, B. & Halperin, B. I. Influence of interactions on flux and back-gateperiod of quantum Hall interferometers.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  98 , 106801 (2007).22. Zhang, Y.  et al  . Distinct signatures for Coulomb blockade and Aharonov-Bohminterference in electronic Fabry-Pe´rot interferometers.  Phys. Rev. B  79 , 241304(2009).23. van Loosdrecht, P. H. M.  et al  . Aharonov-Bohm effect in a singly connected pointcontact.  Phys. Rev. B  38 , 10162–10165 (1988).24.Jain, J. K. &Kivelson, S.Model tunneling problems in a high magnetic-field.  Phys.Rev. B  37 , 4111–4117 (1988).25. Ji, Y.  et al  . An electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometer.  Nature  422 , 415–418(2003).26. Neder, I., Heiblum, M., Levinson, Y., Mahalu, D. & Umansky, V. Unexpectedbehavior in a two-path electron interferometer.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  96 , 16804 (2006).27. Sivan, U., Imry, Y. & Hartzstein, C. Aharonov-Bohm and quantum Hall effects insingly connected quantum dots.  Phys. Rev. B  39 , 1242–1245 (1989).28. van Wees, B. J.  et al  . Observation of zero-dimensional states in a one-dimensionalelectron interferometer.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  62 , 2523–2526 (1989).29. McClure, D. T.  et al  . Edge-state velocity and coherence in a quantum Hall Fabry-Pe´rot interferometer.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  103 , 206806 (2009). Figure 5  |  Potential landscape and tunnelling paths across the QPC. (a) Schematic representation of the electrostatic potential in the vicinity of the QPC (in brown), with the ES in yellow and the tunnelling pathsconnectingoppositeES(redandgreen).Onlyoneedgestateisrepresented,for the sake of clarity. (b) top view of the three-dimensional figure in(a), with the various tunnelling probabilities  T  i   between edge states. scientificreports SCIENTIFIC  REPORTS  | 3 : 1416 | DOI: 10.1038/srep01416  4  30. Yamauchi, Y.  et al  . Universality of bias- and temperature-induced dephasing inballistic electronic interferometers.  Phys. Rev. B  79 , 161306(R) (2009).31. Ofek, N.  et al  . Role of interactions in an electronic Fabry-Pe´rot interferometeroperatinginthequantumHalleffectregime. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. 107 ,5276–5281(2010).32. Halperin, B. I., Stern, A., Neder, I. & Rosenow, B. Theory of the Fabry-Pe´rotquantum Hall interferometer.  Phys. Rev. B  83 , 155440 (2011).33. Bu¨ttiker, M. Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobeconductors.  Phys. Rev. B  38 , 9375–9389 (1988).34. Yacoby, A., Heiblum, M., Mahalu, D. & Shtrikman, H. Coherence and phasesensitive measurements in a quantum dot.  Phys. Rev. Lett.  74 , 4047–4050(1995).35. Kouwenhoven, L. P.  et al  . Electron transport in quantum dots. in Mesoscopicelectron transport. (eds. Sohn, L. L., Kouwenhoven, L. P. & Schon, G.)  Series E: Applied sciences (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht)  345 , 105–214 (1997).36. Roulleau, P.  et al  . D. Finite bias visibility of the electronic Mach-Zehnderinterferometer.  Phys. Rev. B  76 , 161309(R) (2007).37. Litvin, L. V., Helzel, A., Tranitz, H. P., Wegscheider, W. & Strunk, C. Edge-channel interference controlled by Landau level filling.  Phys. Rev. B  78 , 075303(2008).38. Martins, F.  et al  . Scanning gate spectroscopy of transport across a quantum Hallnano-island.  New J. Phys.  15 , 013049 (2013).39. van der Wiel, W. G.  et al  . Electromagnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect in a two-dimensional electron gas ring.  Phys. Rev. B  67 , 033307 (2003).40.Hackens, B.  etal  . Dwell-time-limited coherence in open quantum dots.  Phys. Rev.Lett.  94 , 146802 (2005).41. van Houten, H., Beenakker, C. W. J. & Staring, A. A. M. Coulomb BlockadeOscillations in Semiconductor Nanostructures (in Single Charge Tunneling,edited by Grabert, H. & Devoret, M. H.)  NATO ASI series  B294 , (Plenum, New York, 1992).42. Biercuk, M. J., Ilani, S., Marcus, C. M. & McEuen, P. L., Electrical transport insingle-wall carbon nanotubes Carbon Nanotubes. (in Advanced Topics in theSynthesis,Structure,PropertiesandApplications,editedbyJorio,A.,Dresselhaus,G. & Dresselhaus, M. S.)  111 , 455–493 (Springer, Berlin, 2008).  Acknowledgements TheauthorsaregratefultoM.TreffkornandT.Hyartforhelpfuldiscussions.F.M.andB.H.are postdoctoral and associate researchers with the Belgian FRS-FNRS, respectively. Thiswork has been supported by FRFC grants no. 2.4.546.08.F and 2.4503.12, FNRS grant no., by the FSR and ARC program ‘‘Stresstronics’’, by BELSPO (Interuniversity Attraction Pole IAP-6/42), and by the PNANO 2007 program of the ANR (MICATECproject). V.B. acknowledges the award of a Chaire d’excellence by the NanoscienceFoundation in Grenoble.  Authorcontributions F.M., B.H. and S.F. performed the low-temperature SGM experiment; F.M., B.H., V.B. andB.R. analysed the experimental data; L.D. and X.W. grew the InGaAs heterostructure; B.H.processed the sample; B.H., S.F. and F.M. built the low temperature scanning gatemicroscope; B.H., F.M., S.F., H.S., S.H., M.P. and V.B. contributed to the conception of theexperiment; F.M., B.H. and V.B. wrote the paper and all authors discussed the results andcommented on the manuscript.  Additionalinformation Supplementary information  accompanies this paper at Competing financial interests:  The authors declare no competing financial interests. License : This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 UnportedLicense. To view a copy of this license, visit How to cite this article:  Martins, F.  et al  . Coherent tunnelling across a quantum pointcontact in the quantum Hall regime.  Sci. Rep.  3 , 1416; DOI:10.1038/srep01416 (2013). scientificreports SCIENTIFIC  REPORTS  | 3 : 1416 | DOI: 10.1038/srep01416  5
Similar documents
View more...
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!