Blackburn, Simon - Think, A Compelling Intro to Philosophy v3.0

Think A compelling introduction to philosophy by Simon Blackburn eVersion 3.0 / Notes at EOF Back Cover: Blackburn has produced the one book eery smart person should read to understand! and een en oy! the key #uestions o$ philosophy! ran%in% $rom those about $ree &ill and morality to &hat &e can really kno& about the &orld around us. '' (alter )saacson! Time Magazine *his is a &onder$ully stimulatin%! incisie and '' the &ord is not too stron% '' thrillin% introduction to the pleasures and
of 145
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  Think   A compelling introduction to philosophy  by Simon BlackburneVersion 3.0 / Notes at EOF Back Cover: Blackburn has produced the one book eery smart person should read to understand! andeen enoy! the key #uestions o$ philosophy! ran%in% $rom those about $ree &ill and morality to &hat &e can really kno& about the &orld around us. '' (alter )saacson! Time Magazine *his is a &onder$ully stimulatin%! incisie and '' the &ord is not too stron% '' thrillin% introduction to the pleasures and problems o$ philosophy. '' +ohn Banille!  Irish Times O,FO-N)VE-S)* 1-ESS2reat larendon Street! O4$ord O,5 61O4$ord niersity 1ress is a department o$ the niersity o$ O4$ord.)t $urthers the niersity7s obectie o$ e4cellence in research! scholarship!and education by publishin% &orld&ide inO4$ord Ne& ork 8thens 8uckland Ban%kok Bo%oti Buenos 8ires alcutta apeto&n hennai ares Salaam elhi Florence 9on% :on% )stanbul:arachi :uala ;umpur <adrid <elbourne <e4ico ity <umbai Nairobi 1aris Sao 1aulo Sin%apore *aipei *okyo *oronto (arsa&&ith associated companies in Berlin )badanO4$ord is a re%istered trade mark o$ O4$ord niersity 1ress in the : and in certain other countries= Simon Blackburn >???*he moral ri%hts o$ the author hae been assertedatabase ri%ht O4$ord niersity 1ress @makerAFirst published >???8ll ri%hts resered. No part o$ this publication may be reproduced! stored in a retrieal system! or transmitted! in any $orm or by any means!&ithout the prior permission in &ritin% o$ O4$ord niersity 1ress!or as e4pressly permitted by la&! or under terms a%reed &ith the appropriaterepro%raphics ri%hts or%aniation. En#uiries concernin% reproductionoutside the scope o$ the aboe should be sent to the -i%hts epartment!O4$ord niersity 1ress! at the address aboeou must not circulate this book in any other bindin% or coer and you must impose this same condition on any ac#uirer British ;ibrary atalo%uin% in 1ublication ataata aailable ;ibrary o$ on%ress atalo%in% in 1ublication ataata aailable )SBN 0'>?'5>005C'6 @hbk.A )SBN 0'>?'?6?0D'> @pbk.A3   ? >0 D 6 C  *ypeset by )nisible )nk  Preface * 9)S   BOO:    2-E(   F-O<  years o$ &restlin% &ith the problems o$ tryin% to interest  people in ideas. ) hae done this as a teacher! but also as someone &ho has tried to e4plain the alue o$ the humanities in %eneral! and philosophy in particular! to a &ider audience. )ndeed my $irst debt is to the climate o$ the times! &hose scepticism about the alue o$ hi%her education made it eident to me ust ho& ur%ent this task is. 8 second! more serious debt is to all the students o$ many years! &hose nods and $ro&ns eentually shaped the book. ) also o&e a debt to teachin% assistants here at the niersity o$ North arolina! &ho had $irst'hand e4perience o$ en%a%in% students in earlier ersions o$ the &ork. ) &ould neer hae taken the plun%e! ho&eer! had it not been $or the %enerous encoura%ement o$ atherine larke and 8n%us 1hillips! at O4$ord niersity 1ress. 8n%us has closely monitored the pro%ress o$ the &ork! and ) o&e much to his support andadice.Earlier ersions o$ the material hae been read by 9u& 1rice and -alph (alker! &ho each proided inaluable su%%estions. uri Balasho and an -yder %ae me help &ith speci$ic topics. For the sake o$ breity ) hae not included a %lossary o$  philosophical terms! &hich &ould in any case hae echoed de$initions $ound in my Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. *he superb editin% o$ <aura 9i%h and 8n%ela Blackburn %ae me an uncom$ortable sense o$ my shortcomin%s as a &riter! &hile happily dis%uisin% them $rom the &ider public. 8n%ela! o$ course! had also to su$$er the usual burdens o$ hain% a &ritin% husband! and &ithout her support nothin% &ould hae been possible.Simon Blackburn Contents )ntroduction>. :no&led%e5. <ind 3. Free (ill C. *he Sel$ . 2od 6. -easonin% . *he (orld D. (hat to o  Introduction *his book is $or people &ho &ant to think about the bi% themesG kno&led%e! reason! truth! mind! $reedom! destiny! identity! 2od! %oodness! ustice. *hese are not the hidden  presere o$ specialists. *hey are thin%s that men and &omen &onder about naturally! $or they structure the &ays &e think about the &orld and our place in it. *hey are also themes about &hich thinkers hae had thin%s to say. )n this book ) try to introduce &ays o$ thinkin% about the bi% themes. ) also introduce some o$ the thin%s thinkers hae had tosay about them. )$ readers hae absorbed this book! then they should be on better terms &ith the bi% themes. 8nd they should be able to read many other&ise ba$$lin% maor thinkers &ith pleasure and reasonable understandin%.*he &ord philosophy carries un$ortunate connotationsG impractical! un&orldly! &eird. )suspect that all philosophers and philosophy students share that moment o$ silent embarrassment &hen someone innocently asks us &hat &e do. ) &ould pre$er to introduce mysel$ as doin% conceptual en%ineerin%. For ust as the en%ineer studies the structure o$ material thin%s! so the philosopher studies the structure o$ thou%ht. nderstandin% the structure inoles seein% ho& parts $unction and ho& they interconnect. )t means kno&in% &hat &ould happen $or better or &orse i$ chan%es &ere made. *his is &hat &e aim at &hen &e inesti%ate the structures that shape our ie& o$ the &orld. Our concepts or ideas $orm the mental housin% in &hich &e lie. (e may end up proud o$ the structures &e hae built. Or &e may beliee that they need dismantlin% and startin% a$resh. But $irst! &e hae to kno& &hat they are. *he book is sel$'standin% and does not presuppose that the reader has any other resources. But it could be au%mented. For e4ample! it could be read alon%side some o$ the primary source materials$rom &hich ) $re#uently #uote. *hese are readily aailable classics! such as escartes7s  Meditations, or Berkeley7s Three Dialogues, or 9ume7s  Enuiry !oncerning uman #nderstanding, or his  Dialogues !oncerning $atural %eligion. But it can e#ually &ell beread on its o&n &ithout the te4ts to hand. 8nd a$ter $inishin% it! the reader should pick upthe classics! and other thin%s like lo%ic te4ts or &ritin%s on ethics! &ith a mind prepared. WHAT ARE WE TO THINK ABOUT 9ere are some #uestions any o$ us mi%ht ask about ourselesG (hat am )H (hat is consciousnessH ould ) surie my bodily deathH an ) be sure that other people7s e4periences and sensations are like mineH )$ ) can7t share the e4perience o$ others! can ) communicate &ith themH o &e al&ays act out o$ sel$'interestH <i%ht ) be a kind o$  puppet! pro%rammed to do the thin%s that ) beliee ) do out o$ my o&n $ree &illH9ere are some #uestions about the &orldG (hy is there somethin% and not nothin%H (hatis the di$$erence bet&een past and $utureH (hy does causation run al&ays $rom past to $uture! or does it make sense to think that the $uture mi%ht in$luence the pastH (hy does nature keep on in a re%ular &ayH oes the &orld presuppose a reatorH 8nd i$ so! can &e  understand &hy he @or she or theyA created itHFinally! here are some #uestions about ourseles and   the &orldG 9o& can &e be sure that the &orld is really like &e take it to beH (hat is kno&led%e! and ho& much do &e haeH (hat makes a $ield o$ in#uiry a scienceH @)s psychoanalysis a scienceH )s economicsHA 9o& do &e kno& about abstract obects! like numbersH 9o& do &e kno& about alues and dutiesH 9o& are &e to tell &hether our opinions are obectie! or ust subectieH*he #ueer thin% about these #uestions is that not only are they ba$$lin% at $irst si%ht! but they also de$y simple processes o$ solution. )$ someone asks me &hen it is hi%h tide! ) kno& ho& to set about %ettin% an ans&er. *here are authoritatie tide tables ) can consult.) may kno& rou%hly ho& they are produced. 8nd i$ all else $ails! ) could %o and measure the rise and $all o$ the sea mysel$. 8 #uestion like this is a matter o$ e4perienceG an empirical #uestion. )t can be settled by means o$ a%reed procedures! inolin% lookin% and seein%! makin% measurements! or applyin% rules that hae been tested a%ainst e4perience and $ound to &ork. *he #uestions o$ the last para%raphs are not like this. *heyseem to re#uire more re$lection. (e don7t immediately kno& &here to look. 1erhaps &e $eel &e don7t #uite kno& &hat &e mean &hen &e ask them! or &hat &ould count as %ettin% a solution. (hat &ould sho& me! $or instance! &hether ) am not a$ter all a  puppet! pro%rammed to do the thin%s ) beliee ) do $reelyH Should &e ask scientists &ho specialie in the brainH But ho& &ould they kno& &hat to look $orH 9o& &ould they kno& &hen they had $ound itH )ma%ine the headlineG Neuroscientists discoer human  bein%s not puppets. 9o&H So &hat %ies rise to such ba$$lin% #uestionsH )n a &ord! sel$'re$lection. 9uman bein%s are relentlessly capable o$ re$lectin% on themseles. (e mi%ht do somethin% out o$ habit! but then &e can be%in to re$lect on the habit. (e can habitually think thin%s! and then re$lect on &hat &e are thinkin%. (e can ask ourseles @or sometimes &e %et asked by other peopleA &hether &e kno& &hat &e are talkin% about. *o ans&er that &e need to re$lect on our o&n positions! our o&n understandin% o$ &hat &e are sayin%! our o&n sources o$ authority. (e mi%ht start to &onder &hether &e kno& &hat &e mean. (e mi%ht &onder &hether &hat &e say is obectiely true! or merely the outcome o$ our o&n perspectie! or our o&n take on asituation. *hinkin% about this &e con$ront cate%ories like kno&led%e! obectiity! truth! and &e may &ant to think about them. 8t that point &e are reflecting on concepts and  procedures and belie$s that &e normally ust use. (e are lookin% at the sca$$oldin% o$ our thou%ht! and doin% conceptual en%ineerin%.*his point o$ re$lection mi%ht arise in the course o$ #uite normal discussion. 8 historian! $or e4ample! is more or less bound at some point to ask &hat is meant by obectiity or  eidence ! or een truth ! in history. 8 cosmolo%ist has to pause $rom solin% e#uations &ith the letter t in them! and ask &hat is meant! $or instance! by the $lo& o$ time or the direction o$ time or the be%innin% o$ time. But at that point! &hether they reco%nie it or not! they become philosophers. 8nd they are be%innin% to do somethin% that can be done &ell or badly. *he point is to do it &ell.9o& is philosophy learnedH 8 better #uestion isG ho& can thinkin% skills be ac#uiredH *he thinkin% in #uestion inoles attendin% to basic structures o$ thou%ht. *his can be done &ell or badly! intelli%ently or ineptly. But doin% it &ell is not primarily a matter o$ ac#uirin% a body o$ kno&led%e. )t is more like playin% the piano &ell. )t is a kno&in% ho& as much as a kno&in% that . *he most $amous philosophical character o$ the
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!