Instruction manuals

A New Neural Network Model for Evaluating the Performance of Various Hourly

Model for Evaluating
of 6
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  A new neural network model for evaluating the performance of various hourlyslope irradiation models: Implementation for the region of Athens E.D. Mehleri * , P.L. Zervas, H. Sarimveis, J.A. Palyvos, N.C. Markatos National Technical University of Athens, School of Chemical Engineering, Zographou Campus, Athens 15780, Greece a r t i c l e i n f o  Article history: Received 27 May 2009Accepted 30 September 2009Available online 26 November 2009 Keywords: Hourly slope irradiation modelsIsotropic modelsAnisotropic modelsRadial basis function (RBF) a b s t r a c t The present study is divided into two parts. The first part deals with the comparison of various hourlyslope irradiation models, found in the literature, and the selection of the most accurate for the region of Athens. In the second part the prediction of global solar irradiance on inclined surfaces is performed,based on neural network techniques.The models tested are classified as isotropic (Liu and Jordan, Koronakis, Jimenez and Castro, Badescu,Tian) and anisotropic (Bugler, Temps and Coulson, Klucher, Ma and Iqbal, Reindl) based on the treatmentof diffuse irradiance. For the aforementioned models, a qualitative comparison, based on diagrams, wascarried out, and several statistical indices were calculated (coefficient of determination  R 2 , mean biaserror MBE, relative mean bias error MBE/A(%), root mean square error RMSE, relative root mean squareerror RMSE/A(%),statistical index t-stat), in order to select the optimal.The isotropic models of ‘‘Tian’’ and ‘‘Badescu’’ show the best accordance to the recorded values. Theanisotropic model of ‘‘Ma&Iqbal’’ and the pseudo-isotropic model of ‘‘Jimenez&Castro’’, show poorperformance compared to other models. Finally, a neural network model is developed, which predictsthe global solar irradiance on a tilted surface, using as input data the total solar irradiance on a horizontalsurface, the extraterrestrial radiation, the solar zenith angle and the solar incidence angle on a tiltedplane. The comparison with the aforementioned models has shown that the neural network model,predicts more realistically the total solar irradiance on a tilted surface, as it performs better in regionswhere the other models show underestimation or overestimation in their calculations.   2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Solarenergyisasustainable,safeandabundantenergyresourceand therefore there are no restrictions of time and space for itsexploitation [1]. Concerning the exploitation of solar energy, it isdivided into three basic application categories: passive solarsystems, active solar systems and photovoltaic systems (Fig. 1).Passive and active solar systems exploit the thermal energy of global solar irradiance, while photovoltaic systems convert globalsolar irradiance to electrical power through the photovoltaicphenomenon.Estimating global solar irradiance on tilted surfaces is necessaryas the majority of solar systems are inclined according to the siteof installationandutilization.Moreover,beamanddiffusecomponentsof global solar irradiance on inclined surfaces are essential in orderto calculate theelectricpowerofphotovoltaicsystems, design solarthermal systems and to evaluate their long-term average perfor-mance.Despite the fact that manymeteorological stationsmeasureglobal and diffuse irradiation received on horizontal surfaces thedata on inclined surfaces are not available and are estimated withseveral models [2], using the components of global solar irradianceon horizontal surfaces. It must be noted that the knowledge of thecomponents of global solar irradiance on horizontal surfaces isessential for the prediction of global solar irradiance on tiltedsurfaces,asitisdifficulttodevelopasimplemodelconvertingsolarirradiance received by the horizontal plane to that arriving to aninclined area for two main reasons [3]:   Global solar irradiance reaching a tilted surface includes irra-diance reflected from the surroundings.   The view angle of a tilted surface cuts out a limited solid angleof the sky. This sky irradiation not only depends on the tiltangle,ontheazimuthofthecollectorandonthesolarelevationand azimuth but also depends on the cloud conditions.  Abbreviations:  ANN, Artificial neural network; MBE, Mean bias error; MBE/A(%),Relative mean bias error (%); RBF, Radial basis function; RMSE, Root mean squareerror; RMSE/A (%), Relative root mean square error (%); t-stat, t - statistical. *  Corresponding author. Tel.:  þ 30 210 7723235; fax:  þ 30 210 7723228. E-mail address: (E.D. Mehleri). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable Energy journal homepage: 0960-1481/$ – see front matter    2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.005 Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 1357–1362  The models for predicting global solar irradiance on tiltedsurfaces are classified as isotropic and anisotropic.The isotropic models [4–8], predict the diffuse irradiance ona tilted surface, assuming the uniformity of diffuse sky irradianceover the sky dome. However, his theory is not correct [9] andtherefore additional models are developed, known as anisotropicmodels. The anisotropic models assume the anisotropy of thediffuse sky irradiance in the circumsolar region (sky near the solardisk) and an isotropically diffuse component for the rest of the skydome. Besides the anisotropic models that have been tested in thispaper are: Ma & Iqbal [10], Bugler [11], Temps & Coulson [12], Klucher [13], Reindl [14]. This paper consists of two parts. In the first part, several modelsfor predicting global solar irradiance on inclined surfaces are pre-sented and evaluated by the computation of several statisticalindices. In the second part, a new empirical model for predictingglobal solar irradiance on inclined surfaces is developed, based onNeural Network Techniques [15]. 2. Presentation of the models In this section, the procedure for predicting global solar irradi-ance on inclined surfaces is analytically presented.  2.1. Theory and models Global solar irradiance incident on a tilted plane ( It  ), consists of three components: beam ( It  b ) which derives from the solar disc,diffuse ( It  d ) which derives fromthe sky dome and ground-reflected( It  r  ) which derives from the surrounding area: It   ¼  It  b  þ  It  d  þ  It  r   (1) The amount of beam irradiance incident on a tilted surfacedepends on the angle of solar incidence. Diffuse and ground-reflected irradiance on a tilted surface, do not depend on theorientation of the tilted surface and they do not come from thewhole sky dome or the surrounding area. Hence, the diffuse irra-diance incident on the tilted surface comes from the partof the skydome that ‘‘sees’’ this surface.The beam and ground-reflected components are calculated byusing simple algorithms. The nature of the diffuse component ismore complicated and needs more attention.The equations used for the prediction of the beam and ground-reflected components are presented below: It  b  ¼  I  b $ R b  (2) R b  ¼  cos  q = cos q  z   (3)cos  q  z   ¼  sin  4 $ sin  d $ cos  4 $ cos  d $ cos  u  (4)cos  q  ¼  sin  d $ sin  4 $ cos  b   sin  d $ cos  4 $ sin  b $ cos  g þ cos  d $ cos  4 $ cos  b $ cos  u þ cos  d $ sin  4 $ sin  b $ cos  g $ cos  u þ cos  d $ sin  b $ sin  g $ sin  u (5) where  It  b  is the hourly beam irradiance on inclined surfaces,  q  z   isthe solar zenith angle,  q  is the solar incidence angle on a tiltedplane,  4  is the latitude of the location,  d  is the solar declination, b  is the tilt angle,  u  is the solar hour angle and  g  is the azimuthalangle. The ground-reflected component, on the other hand, isgiven by It  r   ¼  1 = 2 $ r   g  $ I  $ ð 1  cos  b Þ  (6) where r   g  isthegroundreflectivityand I  istheglobalsolarirradianceon horizontal surfaces.  2.2. Diffuse irradiance models Table1,presentsthemodelsforpredictingthediffuseirradiancecomponent of global solar irradiance on a tilted surface, chosen forthis study. Fig. 1.  Basic applications of global solar irradiance. Nomenclature  A i  Ratio of the hourly beam solar irradiance ona horizontal surface to the extraterrestrial solarradiation ( I  b / I  oh ) (dimensionless) b  Tilt angle (  )  f   Horizon brightening  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I  b = I  p   (dimensionless) F   ð 1  ð I  d = I  Þ 2 Þ  (dimensionless) I   Globalsolarirradianceonahorizontalsurface( kW  / m 2 ) Irec   Recorded values of hourly global solar irradiance ona horizontal surface ( kW  / m 2 ) I  b  Hourly beam irradiance on a horizontal surface( kW  / m 2 ) I  brec   Recorded values of hourly beam irradiance ona horizontal surface ( kW  / m 2 ) I  d  Hourly diffuse irradiance on a horizontal surface( kW  / m 2 ) I  drec   Recorded values of hourly diffuse irradiance ona horizontal surface ( kW  / m 2 ) I  oh  Hourly extraterrestrial radiation ( kW  / m 2 ) It   Hourly global solar irradiance on an inclined surface( kW  / m 2 ) It  b  Hourlybeamirradianceonaninclinedsurface( kW  / m 2 ) It  d  Hourly diffuse irradiance on an inclined surface( kW  / m 2 ) It  r   Hourly ground-reflected irradiance on an inclinedsurface ( kW  / m 2 ) It  rec   Recorded values of hourlyglobal solar irradiance on aninclined surface ( kW  / m 2 ) k t   Clearness index (dimensionless) r   g   Ground reflectivity (dimensionless) R 2 Coefficient of determination (dimensionless) R b  cos q / cos q  z   (dimensionless) g  Solar azimuth angle (  ) d  Solar declination (  ) q  Solar incidence angle on a tilted surface (  ) q  z   Solar zenith angle (  ) 4  Latitude of the site (  ) u  Solar hour angle (  ) E.D. Mehleri et al. / Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 1357–1362 1358  3. Formulation of the database The data used for the comparison of the models mentionedabove and the derivation of the empirical model for predictingglobal solar irradiance on inclined surfaces were recorded at thestation of the National Technical University of Athens (37  58 0 26 00 B,23  47 0 16 00 A, 219 m above mean sea level) [16]. These data are ten-minutevaluesofglobal,beamanddiffuseirradianceonahorizontalsurfaceandoninclinedsurfaces(32  )respectively, fortheperiodof one year (January 2004–December 2004), transformed into 8760hourly values. Then, after extracting the zero values of global solarirradiance on tilted surfaces, the final database consists of 4283values, as presented in Table 2. 4. Statistical methods of comparison The evaluation of the models presented in Table 1, as well as of the RBF neural network model, was carried out based on thecomputation of several statistical indices [17–19].Coefficient of Determination: R 2 ¼ P ni ¼ 1 ð It  i    Itmean Þ $ ð Itrec  i    Itrecmean Þ  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi P ni ¼ 1 ð It  i    Itmean Þ 2 #v uut  $ P ni ¼ 1 ð Itrec  i    Itmean Þ 2 # Root mean square error: RMSE  ¼  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiX ni ¼ 1 ð It  i    Itrec  i Þ 2 = n v uut Mean bias error: MBE   ¼ X ni ¼ 1 ð It  i    Itrec  i Þ = n t-statistical: t    stat  ¼  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð n   1 Þ $ MBE 2 RMSE 2  MBE 2 s  Relative mean bias error: MBE =  A ð % Þ ¼  MBE P ni ¼ 1  It  i  n  100 Relative root mean square error: RMSE =  A ð % Þ ¼  RMSE P ni ¼ 1  It  i  n  100 Mean error: Mean Error  ¼ P ni ¼ 1 ð It  i    Itrec  i Þ = Itrec  i n   100 where  It  i  is the  ith  predicted value of Global Solar Irradiance oninclined surfaces,  Itrec  i  is the  ith  measured value,  Itmean  is thepredicted mean value,  Itrecmean  is the measured mean value,  n  isthe number of data analyzed. 5. An introduction to artificial neural networks Neurons are the basic elements of the human brain. Their basicfunction is to provide us with the ability to apply our previousexperiences to our actions [20]. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs)are computing algorithms that mimic the four basic functions of these biological neurons. These functions receive inputs from otherneurons or sources, combine them, perform operations on theresult, and output the final result. What makesANNs exciting is the  Table 1 Details and mathematical relationships of diffuse models selected for current study.Model Year Type a Equation Ref. b Liu & Jordan 1962 Iso  It  d  ¼  Id $ ðð 1 þ cos  b Þ = 2 Þ  [4]Temps & Coulson 1977 Ani  It  d  ¼  Id $ cos 2 ð b = 2 Þ $ ½ 1 þ sin 3 ð b = 2 Þ $ ½ð 1 þ cos 2 q Þ $ sin 3 q  z    [12]Bugler 1977 Ani  It  d  ¼ ð 1 þ cos  b = 2 Þ $ ð Id   0 : 05 $ It  b $ cos  q  z  Þ þ ð 0 : 05 $ It  b $ cos  q Þ  [11]Klucher 1979 Ani  It  d  ¼  Id $ ðð 1 þ cos  b Þ = 2 Þ $ ð 1 þ  F  $ sin 3 ð b = 2 ÞÞ $ ð 1 þ  F  $ cos 2 b $ sin 3 q  z  Þ F   ¼  1  ð Id = I  2 Þ  [13]Ma&Iqbal 1983 Ani  It  d  ¼  Id $ ½ð k t  $ R b  þ ð 1   k t  Þ $ ð cos 2 ð b = 2 ÞÞ  k t   ¼  I  = I  oh R b  ¼  cos  q = cos  q  z    [10] Jimenez & Castro 1986 Pseudo-iso  It  d  ¼ ð 0 : 5 Þ $ ð 0 : 2 Þ $ I  $ ð 1 þ  cos  b Þ It  b  ¼  0 : 8 $ I  $ R b  [6]Koronakis 1986 Pseudo-Iso  It  d  ¼ ð 1 = 3 Þ $ Id $ ð 2 þ cos  b Þ  [5]Reindl 1990 Ani  It  d  ¼  Id $ ½ð 1   A i Þ $ ðð 1 þ cos  b Þ = 2 Þ $ ð 1 þ  f  $ ð sin 3 ð b = 2 ÞÞ þ ð  A i $ R b Þ  f   ¼  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Ib = I  p   A i  ¼  Ib = I  oh R b  ¼  cos  q = cos  q  z  i  [14]Tian 2001 Iso  It  d  ¼  Id $ ð 1   b = 180 Þ  [8]Badescu 2002 Iso  It  d  ¼  Id $ ðð 3 þ cos  ð 2 b ÞÞ = 4 Þ  [7] a Iso: Isotropic, Ani: Anisotropic. b Ref: Reference.  Table 2 The database.No of Data Ib rec  Id rec  I rec  It rec 1 0.00055176 0.020282 0.020833 0.0141672 0.19003 0.066301 0.25633 0.36833– – – – –– – – – –40 0.0010649 0.041602 0.042667 0.03916741 0.00025615 0.0022438 0.0025 0.0025– – – – –4283 0.00038376 0.0019496 0.0023333 0.0016667In kW/m 2 . E.D. Mehleri et al. / Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 1357–1362  1359  fact that, once a network has been set up, it can learn in a self-organizing way that emulates brain functions such as patternrecognition, classification, and optimization. An ANN is character-ized by its architecture, training or learning algorithm, and activa-tion function. The architecture describes the connection betweenthe neurons. It consists of an input layer, an output layer and,generally, one or more hidden layers in-between [21]. The layers inthese networks are interconnected by communication links thatare associated with weights which dictate the effect on the infor-mationpassing through them.The activation function, on the otherhand, relates the output of a neuron to its input, based on theneuron’s input activity level [22]. 5.1. RBF network implementation The radial basis function network consists of an input layer, anoutput layer and usually but not necessarily, one hidden layer inwhich the activation function is Gaussian [23], as presented inFig.2.Thisarchitectureexhibitsimportantadvantagescomparedtoother neural network architectures, such as the simple networktopology, the local rather than global approximation they achieve,and the fast algorithms that have been developed for training suchnetworks. The learning process of an RBF network involves usingthe input–output data to determine the number of the hiddennodes, the centres of the hidden nodes, and the output weights, sothat the error between the predicted and the recorded values isminimal. 6. Development of the RBF neural network model In the present work the RBF neural network is structured sothat it can predict the global solar irradiance on inclined surfaces, It  , as an output variable, using as independent input parameters:the global solar irradiance on a horizontal surface, the extrater-restrial radiation, the solar zenith angle and the solar incidenceangle on a tilted plane. Thus the input vector  x  is defined as  x  ¼  [ I  , I  oh , q  z  , q  z  ] T .The neural network output provides the global solar irradianceon inclined surfaces  I  t   as an output and it is calculated as theweighted sum of the responses of the hidden layers: I  t   ¼ X L j ¼ 1 w  j  z   j ð  x Þ where  z   j ð  x Þ ¼  f  ðk  x    x  j k 22 Þ In the above equations  z   j  is the response of the  jth  node,  f   is theradial basis function,  x  j  is the centre of the  jth  node,  L  is the totalnumber of hidden nodes and  w  j  is the weight corresponding to theresponse of the  jth  node.An RBF training procedure, aims at the determination of thenumber of nodes in the hidden layer, the hidden node centres andtheoutputweights,inordertominimizethedeviationbetweenthemeasured and predicted values of the output variables over the setof the available database.The training method used in this work is based on the fuzzypartition of the input space, which is produced by defininga number of triangular fuzzy sets in the domain of each inputvariable [24]. The centres of these fuzzy sets form a multidimen-sional grid on the input space. A rigorous selection algorithmchooses the most appropriate vertices on the grid, which are thenused as the hidden node centres in the resulting RBF networkmodel. The idea behind the selection algorithm is to place thecentres in the multidimensional input space, so that the distancebetween any two centre locations is guaranteed to be greater thana lower limit, which is defined by the length of the edges on thegrid. At the same time, the algorithm ensures that for any inputexample in the training set there is at least one selected hiddennode that is close enough, according to an appropriately defineddistance criterion. The so-called ‘‘fuzzy-means’’ training methoddoes not need the number of centres to be fixed before theexecution of the method. Due to the fact that it is a one-passalgorithm,itisextremelyfast,eveninthecaseofalargedatabaseof input–output training data. One additional advantage is that thetraining algorithm used needs only one tuning parameter, namelythe number of fuzzy sets that are utilized to partition each inputdimension.The training procedure was used several times by altering ateach run the fuzzy partition of the input space (number of fuzzysets defined in each input dimension), which is in fact the onlydesign parameter that must be defined by the user when utilizingthe fuzzy-means algorithm.Four neural network models were developed by altering thefuzzy partition of the input space. The results were graduallyimproved up to the point where ten fuzzy sets were used topartition the domain of each input variable. A further increaseresultstotheovertrainingphenomenon,wheretheperformanceof the produced model is not improved, although the model increasesin size.The RBF neural network model technique was validated bydeveloping neural network models using 100 random partitions of the data into training and validation sets (75% and 25% of the data,respectively). For each random partition, four neural networkmodels were developed by altering the fuzzy partition of the inputspace. The results were gradually improved up to the point whereten fuzzy sets were used to partition the domain of each inputvariable. A further increase results to the over training phenom-enon, where the performance of the produced model is not Fig. 2.  Standard topology of an RBF neural network.  Table 3 Statistical indices corresponding to RBF neural network models.No of fuzzy sets  R 2 RMSE Mean Error RMSE/A (%)7 0.9397 0.0713 8.4082 19.25658 0.9426 0.0688 7.9939 18.43919 0.9521 0.0628 7.8760 17.503110  0.9600 0.0580 7.6969 15.357 E.D. Mehleri et al. / Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 1357–1362 1360
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!